326

Bluesky continues to soar (techcrunch.com)

submitted 3 months ago by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

145 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 58 points 3 months ago

Blue sky leads to the same trap Twitter was. A place that will be purchased by some asshole that shits on everyone for money.

[-] axum 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You'll be shocked to know that bluesky is open source then and PDS is well on its way to allowing you to host your own instance.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 55 points 3 months ago

I'm shocked to learn that Reddit is opensource back then.

[-] ericjmorey@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Anything that you're not willing and able to keep financially sustained yet rely upon will likely be used against you by someone with more resources. This is why groups like Fosstodon, Beehaw, and Fedihosting Foundation stand out in these spaces. They are both transparent and financially sustainable. But most of that sustainability relies on unpaid volunteer labor.

[-] Blaze@feddit.org 26 points 3 months ago

In its developer’s blog, Bluesky stressed that “guardrails” are still in place. Most significantly, users can only self-host their own accounts for now, and in the next phase, self-hosted servers will initially be limited to 10 accounts each, with rate limits on usage.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/22/24080334/bluesky-self-hosting-servers-data-federated

What is the status now?