841
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 257 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It’s hilarious that the entire point was to draw focus on how Biden fucked up the withdrawal from Afghanistan (while following Trump & literal Taliban combined plan), but all anybody is talking about now is how disrespectful Trump & company is. His purpose for doing this is entirely lost now.

Edit: taliban not isis

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 97 points 7 months ago

The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States–Taliban_deal which was entirely negotiated and ratified by the Trump administration 🙄

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago

If I recall Trump said "they couldn't stop even if they tried"

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

Crowing about it because he will use it as an attack later. Just like the tax bomb set to raise income tax for regular Americans after Donald's term.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 94 points 7 months ago

Donald Trump is not a smart man. He didn't become the threat that he is due to his own skilful manoeuvring. He became a threat because the institutions that are supposed to oppose people like him have failed.

Now that, for the first time in his political career, he's up against an opponent with basic competence he can't do anything other than flail impotently.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago

This has Lewandowksi's fingerprints all over it.

[-] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

It's late, and I misread this as:

This has Lebowski's fingerprints all over it.

Needless to say I was a bit confused.

[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

The Orange man is not the issue, MSM, also, dude, please, Orange-American.

[-] TheDudeV2@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago
[-] prole 5 points 7 months ago

Fucking thank you. I'm tired of people saying he's not stupid... This man is a fucking moron. Low cunning is not the same thing as intelligence.

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 months ago

Even if it worked, that's just more hypocritical nonsense.

"Biden messed up, these 13 Americans are dead. Not quite as many people as I killed by messing up a pandemic response, or by blowing the cover of American spies, but if I get in office again I'm sure my decisions will kill a lot more people. What were we talking about again?"

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago

literal Isis

You mean the Taliban's plan, the US negotiated the withdrawal with the Taliban.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

It is crazy to expect the Afghanistan military to fight when the US president negotiated handover of Afghanistan with the Taliban

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

I mean the afghan military was only marginally less awful than the Taliban, sometimes significantly worse, and they weren't exclusive evils to the afghan people. Turns out giving money and arms to the worst psychopaths you can find to fight the other group of psychopaths you gave money and arms to doesn't have a good outcome.

To quote an afghan before the withdrawal: We have three problems, Kabul, the Taliban, and the Americans. When the Americans leave, we will have two problems.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

The us involvement in Afghanistan was truly one of the biggest blunders in a century and it didn't have to be. It wasn't just one president but a 20 year failure in state building, that had been run with profit in mind. The us used to be able to do this in Japan and Korea(only the South though). I believe it was the corruption and the contractors that set up such a terrible state.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Given the massacres and decades of terror under the dictatorship that were required to create modern South Korea, I wouldn't hold it up as a success.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Yes, that’s what I meant… I’ll edit…

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
841 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22959 readers
2877 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS