187
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
187 points (100.0% liked)
Games
16714 readers
461 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's just a moba but ~~first~~ 3rd person, it's no TF2 that's for sure...
I thought it was third person?
True, i was zooming in so often I forgot it was 3rd person 😅
Oh, an FPS, groundbreaking. Hard pass.
I'd be keen on it if it was just an action/shooter and wasn't a moba 😅
Maybe we're just not the target audience?
Because something is an FPS it can't be groundbreaking? FPS is an incredibly wide genre, something being an FPS does not mean it cant be doing new incredible things.
Not that I'm saying this game is groundbreaking, it isn't, but it is a really excellent fusion of two of the most popular genres in the world.
What is your point? If you don't like people's opinions about their personal video game preferences, you're not obligated to comment aimlessly.
My point was that a game being from a common genre has nothing to do with its ability to innovate. Not sure where I implied that I was obligated to reply to you. I disagreed with your sentiment, so I shared my own opinion. It's fine if you feel my comment was aimless, but I disagree.
The Miranda Priestly reference means that I personally don't find it interesting regardless of it being innovative. But I don't appreciate that you're compulsively disagreeing with me on a personal preference, lecturing me on the obvious, and contradicting yourself in the middle of it.
Yeah, I mean where's all the hats?
I mean pre-hat TF2...