249
submitted 10 months ago by Agent_Karyo@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 84 points 10 months ago

It's false equivalence to claim steam has a monopoly when you're literally giving epic a monopoly on your games for financial kickbacks between yourselves that in the best case doesn't impact the user and worst case actively compells them to a much worse platform. What epic and gearbox did is monopolistic, what steam did is just make a good enough product that no one gives a sh*t about EGS. If you want an actual competitive store front, make something your users want, not your business partners. Gog is struggling but it's still my first goto for games because even if it's missing all of steams functionality, it gives me ownership of games that can't just be revoked or broken by publishers. That's a value add I'm willing to pay for. Paying more so publishers can make more money and sell a worse experience through EGS ain't moving me.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Steam has exclusive games too. Is that okay?

[-] GalacticHero@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

It’s a little different to have your own games exclusively on your platform than to pay other devs not to release on other platforms, and it’s entirely different if devs just choose not to release elsewhere because no other store is worth the effort for them.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Steam did exactly that for years under the "Steam Greenlight" prism where users voted for games to be released on steam with the condition that they would be exclusive. They only stopped it when they decided to go the Amazon route and sell any old shit with zero curation instead.

And Tim Sweeny made the offer to stop offering Epic exclusivity and even sell their games on Steam if Valve offered to provide their service to developers at the same rate as Epic.

But Steam charges nearly triple what Epic does and can depend on gamers to defend them for some reason.

[-] GalacticHero@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

The cut taken by stores is of little concern to me as a consumer. Greenlight was a mess for a lot of reasons, but they discontinued it years ago, while Epic continues to pay for exclusivity deals. Steam provides lots of services to me that Epic doesn’t, though, as others have listed here. That said, I also like GOG and itch.io.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It makes the cost of developing games more expensive. They have to charge nearly 20% more for games on Steam to make the same money they do on EGS.

It's also why Valve hardly makes games anymore. They sell 4 games made with other people's money and they'll have the same gross income as selling a game they paid to develop. Throw in the cost of development, and they just can't justify game development as a major part of their business.

The last time they made a full-sized game was Half-life 2, which launched the same day as Steam.

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

This argument about cost of development would hold more weight if the game store savings were passed onto the users rather than just eaten up by the publishers. Borderlands 3 base game has the exact same price on steam vs EGS atm, £49.99. Clearly those 20% savings are just extra money the publisher wants to pocket rather than actual necessary costs to the game. If their happy to pass it off to steam when sold on the steam platform rather than raise the price to recoup the platform tax.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes, but with EGS more money goes to the company making the games. AAA games have never been more expensive to produce, and developers are shutting doors left and right. After the costs of marketing and overhead, more of the proceeds of the game are going to the fucking download service than the people making the game when it's on Steam.

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Blame the publishers then. They set the price and they dictate the bonuses of the devs based on sales. Choosing to believe more money from the game store is actually making its way to devs instead of shareholders is naive at best.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Alyx was a full game, portal 1/2?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Alyx was a tech demo, and it, Portal, and Portal 2 combined are about the size of Half Life 2.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

Have you played Alyx? It's a full game

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's litterally a tunnel shooter with endless repetition to pad it out and pretend it's a full game, when in reality it's a tech demo to bundle with VR hardware and try and make Steam the default home of VR games.

[-] brenno@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

And Tim Sweeny made the offer to stop offering Epic exclusivity and even sell their games on Steam if Valve offered to provide their service to developers at the same rate as Epic.

Tim Sweeny didn't make an offer, he tried to make positive PR to EGS while trying to paint Valve as the bad guys; Valve obviously wouldn't charge the same rate as Epic because they include a lot more value for both user and developers than Epic does: to list a few of Valve services that Epic doesn't have:

  • Steam Workshop (hosting terabytes of content for absolutely free);
  • Family sharing;
  • Steam Link for game streaming;
  • Remote Play Together tech for all the major OSes;
  • Linux and Wine/Proton investments (which you could argue was an investment because of the Steam Deck, but that's an investment that benefits everyone, regardless of whether they own a Steam Deck or not);
  • Cloud save hosting;
  • Universal controller remapping interface compatible with all the major gamepads;

That's not to mention the benefits developers can get from Steam's platform and SDK:

  • Steam Input (for not needing to deal with custom implementations);
  • Steam Voice API (for in-game voice chats);
  • Steam Inventory and Trading Cards, which can result in extra cash for the developers;
  • Multiple networking options: Steam Game Servers, Steam Matchmaking & Lobbies, Steam Peer-to-peer Networking, etc.

If you ask me, I think Epic is the one charging way too much

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
249 points (100.0% liked)

Games

40590 readers
619 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS