239

Convo about piracy with my friend (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 10 months ago by aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(i’m also gonna ambush my friends about Signal on sunday and coerce them to download it to get rid of the green bubbles)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 37 points 10 months ago

Plz seed.

[-] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 10 months ago

Hop on i2p! I dl’d it there.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I still don't know how I2P would be able to mask where the packets go to or come from, even if they encrypt the contents

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Onion-like routing. It takes multiple hops to get to a destination. Each hop can only decrypt the next destination to send the packet to (i.e. peeling off a layer of the onion).

[-] GrammarPolice@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

So torrenting but it's on TOR. That sounds like it would be hella slow

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, torrents usually run 100-300KiB/s. I guess not too bad for smaller files. About an hour or three per GB.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 1 points 10 months ago

Would that keep lawyers from just taking the last ip they get for their frivolous law suits? That way I could get a letter for something I actually didn't download

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

I mean, you can be sued for anything, but it will get thrown out. Like, I guess the MPAA could offer a movie for download, then try to sue the first hop they upload a chunk to, but that really doesn't make any sense (because they offered it for download in the first place). Furthermore, the first hop(s) aren't the people that are using the file, and they can't even read it. If people could successfully sue nodes, then ISPs and postal services could be sued for anything that passes through their networks.

[-] Laser@feddit.org 2 points 10 months ago

By how the protocol is structured, it's impossible for the address a downloader sees to know what the packet they forward actually contains, so they're just taking the role of an ISP. Also, they don't know the original source IP.