239

Convo about piracy with my friend (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 2 months ago by aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(i’m also gonna ambush my friends about Signal on sunday and coerce them to download it to get rid of the green bubbles)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Onion-like routing. It takes multiple hops to get to a destination. Each hop can only decrypt the next destination to send the packet to (i.e. peeling off a layer of the onion).

[-] GrammarPolice@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

So torrenting but it's on TOR. That sounds like it would be hella slow

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, torrents usually run 100-300KiB/s. I guess not too bad for smaller files. About an hour or three per GB.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

Would that keep lawyers from just taking the last ip they get for their frivolous law suits? That way I could get a letter for something I actually didn't download

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

I mean, you can be sued for anything, but it will get thrown out. Like, I guess the MPAA could offer a movie for download, then try to sue the first hop they upload a chunk to, but that really doesn't make any sense (because they offered it for download in the first place). Furthermore, the first hop(s) aren't the people that are using the file, and they can't even read it. If people could successfully sue nodes, then ISPs and postal services could be sued for anything that passes through their networks.

[-] Laser@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

By how the protocol is structured, it's impossible for the address a downloader sees to know what the packet they forward actually contains, so they're just taking the role of an ISP. Also, they don't know the original source IP.