741
submitted 2 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Milwaukee woman has been jailed for 11 years for killing the man that prosecutors said had sex trafficked her as a teenager. 

The sentence, issued on Monday, ends a six-year legal battle for Chrystul Kizer, now 24, who had argued she should be immune from prosecution. 

Kizer was charged with reckless homicide for shooting Randall Volar, 34, in 2018 when she was 17. She accepted a plea deal earlier this year to avoid a life sentence.

Volar had been filming his sexual abuse of Kizer for more than a year before he was killed.

Kizer said she met Volar when she was 16, and that the man sexually assaulted her while giving her cash and gifts. She said he also made money by selling her to other men for sex.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RestlessNotions@lemmy.world 123 points 2 months ago

If this was how my cards were dealt, I would likely make it my life's mission.

This country certainly goes all in for cruel and unusual punishment.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Well the very act of shooting someone in the head twice, burning their home down, and stealing their car is cruel and unusual punishment.

Despite what everyone in the comments seems to think you're not legally protected from going John Wick on someone regardless of how much they've wronged you or if the system failed you.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

They were dead when they got shot in the head, everything else is largely unrelated to the punishment in my opinion its just cathartic. She couldve done far far worse to him than a quick execution, id have probably ripped out his nails and teeth and then killed him with a power washer via the worst enema.

[-] thejoker954@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Id have cut off his dick and made him choke to death on it.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

What if the house fire she set caused other houses to catch on fire and kill the families living there?

There's an argument for her going to jail for arson if anything.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

Thats actually valid, I was simply pointing out that its just not adding to the cruel and unusual punishment element.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You don't believe the state destroying all of someones possessions after conviction then death doesn't add to cruel and unusual punishment?

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

The difference here is the actions of a state versus the actions of an individual. When its the actions of an individual it should be a case by case IMO burning shit is kinda instinctive. But for the state it is a seperate case altogether since instinct shouldnt factor in. Also this would better be covered by arson and wrongful destruction of property.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Dead's dead, dude.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Mutilating a corpse is also grounds for worse punishment.

However she chose burning down the house to hide the evidence no matter how much sympathy we have for the victim, it’s hard to get past that she was free, she showed premeditation, she drove a considerable distance to find him, she murdered him, and she attempted to hide evidence.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

What part of not cruel and unusual punishment since ya cant punish the dead are ya not getting. Im only addressing that element not the rest of the shit, improper handling of a corpse, grand theft auto, and arson are their own charges.

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

The guy raped several children and sex trafficked them.

I’m of the opinion this girl did the world a favor. There is no rehabbing sex pests

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
741 points (100.0% liked)

News

23232 readers
2952 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS