325
submitted 2 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's not a better way to rate from 0 to 10. It takes way more effort from the user and leads to more people dropping out. And in the end, the result is the same in aggregate. If your opinion is popular, more people will vote like you because the sets of 3 are random. In a survey of thousands, individual opinions don't matter. No one is going to evaluate the answers one by one.

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It takes way more effort from the user and leads to more people dropping out.

Then make it 0 to 3 or 0 to 1 for all I care. You missed the point, which is: If I want or don't want feature A doesn't influence if I want or don't want feature B, and linking the two distorts the results of the poll.

in the end, the result is the same in Aggregate.

Not if you include the human factor of the decision maker, who can twist "wanted less" into "still wanted a bit" as a justification if they want a certain feature for different reasons than user benefit (like, say, a "privacy friendly" but indeed not at all privacy friendly mechanism to give data to add networks). That doesn't fly with "0 points".

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
325 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17763 readers
113 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS