112

Let's welcome the new moderators of c/politics.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Did you even look at their post histories or just add the first people to volunteer?

One of them is running around this sub right now arguing for the dismantling of public education because they didn't enjoy highschool

Edit:

The top mod started pming me...

Apparently he just accepted the only people who said they wouldn't remove disinformation because that would primarily effect "the right"

Only two did and we chose them, wish we had more not trying to censor the right since some were saying “I’ll remove disinformation and etc.” Which violates one of our policy in giving the right a voice since look disinformation may be bad, but removing them is censorship and our goal is not to reform that echo chamber that was r/politics

https://i.imgur.com/0Maach1.jpg

This community is fucked.

No one is going to become a mod here unless they agree to let people spread propaganda...

[-] AToM_exe@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

20 years old, no job, far right and emotional unstable. I think we got the perfect candidate!

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Although, I am curious what gave you that impression? Same with the emotionally unstable part.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aidan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I'm not far-right. I have a job.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"They're not christofascists, they're Christian moralists" ^^1 is a disturbingly far right position post Charlottesville, Dobbs, and all the state laws persecuting trans people that have been passed recently.

I will say, I haven't seen a moderation level action yet that seems horribly wrong, but I feel like that's only going to be a matter of time

^^1 Paraphrased, not a direct quote

e; I apparently can't figure out superscript text

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

The Charlottesville people are largely fascists, but they also don't have that much influence in American politics. Dobbs is not a fascist position. I personally support abortion access- but there is nothing in the Constitution to protect it. As for state laws persecuting trans people I actually have looked that much into what's passed, I've just seen rhetoric. Can you point me to some of the laws that're chrisofascist?

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 14 points 2 years ago

If you have a table of 10 people, and a Nazi sits down and joins them without them kicking him out, you now have a table with 11 Nazis at it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

The Charlottesville people are largely fascists

They were all fascists, and everything else you said is, at best, so deeply ignorant that I don't think I've got the time or mental energy to point out how dumb and dangerous this refusal to see what should be obvious to everyone is. I strongly encourage you to step down as a moderator of this community and strongly encourage anyone who approved your being made a mod to do the same.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

The Charlottesville people are largely fascists, but they also don’t have that much influence in American politics.

The president at the time called them "very fine people" because he was scared of alienating them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AToM_exe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

https://lemmy.world/comment/1093566

Yeah I guess. I've only been able to get internships- good internships. But I've never been able to get a real job

Maybe I misinterpreted that.

What's with all the comments about closing public schools and calling clearly fascist movements as "christian moralists".

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I see you are a @aidan fan. Here is the thing, we all will have different interpretations of political viewpoints. This isn't a open forum for only progressives, conservatives, liberals, moderates, or whatever, it is a shared forum open to different perspectives. You don't have to agree or disagree with anyone's points, but we are one community and everyone's voice can be heard (as long as it doesn't violate the rules or lemmy.world TOS). That is why having aiden is a great asset to the team. Moderators are rarely liked, but we value his commitment to growing the community and providing insight and perspective.

[-] AToM_exe@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Exactly what I wanted to hear.

I hope this place stays open-minded and free to discuss different viewpoints. Even if I don't agree with certain views of one member of the mod team, I'm ok with that. As long as it doesn't influence who can post their opinion.

Thanks for your comment and..

well, we'll see in the future.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Currently working a good internship. Also, talk about stalking!

Edit: I also never advocated closing public schools. I advocated making them voluntary.

Edit 2: I have also been offered a few jobs but are not feasible for me since I want to live near my partner.

[-] AToM_exe@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

I wouldn't consider it stalking but a background-check.

This community could (/will) become the biggest political forum on the web. Wouldn't you want to know who moderates it?

You can go through my post history, nothing to hide. I don't consider it stalking but a feature.

We will follow your journey with great interest.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Of course you're free to, it's just I'd argue a rude thing to do to instead of judging someones actions you criticized them for being vulnerable in a completely different context days ago.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I mean how else people's gonna know who has the moral high ground am I rite

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Locuralacura@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's a traditional right wing position to defund public schools. Right now : 'House Republicans want to cut Title I funding by 80%'

If you don't know, title 1 funding is money for the poorest public schools. The money is often used for nutrition programs, resource educators, special education teachers and Education assistants.

I think you might be too young and inexperienced to be an unbiased moderator.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] oats@lemmy.fmhy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

thank you for pointing this out. guess i'll be unsubscribing and looking for another politics community to join.

[-] UnaSolaEstrellaLibre@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

No, it's worse...

The top mode just pm'ed me saying he only accepted people who said they wouldn't remove disinformation.

Because that would mean more conservative comments got removed, and apparently that's biased and not what this sub is for.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Since misinformation is allowed, well, Lemmygrad is right there and I'm certain there's some choice tankie misinfo.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Also, one thing that's great about lemmy is the public modlog- I think its valuable for a community to be able see mod abuse and call it out.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Is there something glitchy going on or is this community's modlog supposed to just say "mod" did everything?

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Oh oops, I had assumed it showed individual mod names to non-mods as it does to mods. It's interesting because the public api actually does say the mod names So, its either a bug in the web API or in the backend.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (43 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
112 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25059 readers
2039 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS