325
submitted 2 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] carotte 63 points 2 months ago

i don’t like how they used "want least", it means three very different things:

  • i want this but it’s not the thing i want the most
  • i don’t care for this
  • oh god fuck no
[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

That's why they did it in sets of three. They could just give every user a blank text box for every option, but doing it this way makes it far easier to analyze the data in bulk.

[-] carotte 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

yea, but that gives you less info

this way, you can’t really differentiate from a feature that people want, but not as a priority, VS a feature that people don’t want ever

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

And there's no way to relate preference between features, at least in my case. I had one question that I entered "2x faster performance" as most want, and the next question was "2x slower performance," but there was another crappy option in the same list that I also don't want, so if I don't pick "2x slower performance" as least want, what signal does that send?

I hope it all comes out in the wash, but honestly, I would've preferred a big list of all of the features with 4 options:

  • really want
  • want
  • meh
  • don't want

I think I would've entered about even numbers of things for each category. They could even limit "really want" to top three or something.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

It makes the survey easier to complete by users in small steps. Huge surveys scare users away.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago

The survey design accounts for this. See https://lemm.ee/comment/13835466.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
325 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17763 readers
143 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS