[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Well there I would too disagree. His intuition was not completely wrong. Depending on what macroeconomic theory you like, gdp change and inflation are usually related. His interpretation was poor.

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Also does he mean yearly inflation, which is just reevaluated monthly? Whereas quarterly GDP growth? JohnDClay quarterly means four times a year. Furthermore single digit inflation is typically not considered as high. Also GDP growth does not necessarily talk of sucessful economic policy since there was strong decline before, but it does point to poor performance of sanctions.

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

In my country the headline would go something like: Another sucessful attack by Ukraine. Multiple drones were shot down. Putin is furious. UKRAINI SLAVA!!!

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

First they came for the muslims...

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

The dragon fella is obviously a troll or a bot. In this whole discussion he failed to provide single source like you asked him to. Note that it should be relatively easy because he has the western propaganda on his side thanks to his point of view. Thanks for good sources on the donbas atrocities btw.

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Purchased? I think there's a difference there. When they start invading or overthrowing governments like our oil corporarions have done(for example in Nigeria), then maybe there could be some simmilarities.

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I have also read that his initial motivation was that of some soldiers being unfairly targeted. This however would only be problematic if one equates soldiers with war criminals. Source friendlyjordies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdYYIVoCvsM Roughly around 17th minute

australia really is a journalist hellhole. Also may I ask how is this hilarious? It seems to me that you take poor sources and draw brainless conclusions just as intended. But trying to make whistleblowers seem bad is always very interesting

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

But he only exposed some specific soldiers right?(not the state) And why should china be the reference?

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

We treat OUR whistleblowers very differently.

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

This is almost as bad as killing of 20% of the population and more by following with sanctions. I say we're square.

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

He is fighting for the nazis not against them

[-] welldraught@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

now all band together, let's make bullying kill itself...

view more: next ›

welldraught

joined 1 year ago