[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago

I mean, the real answer is that most open source developers aren't here for freedom at any cost. They're here like a startup... Waiting to be acquired for big bucks. Open source doesn't pay bills, and if a megacorp pulls up in a Brinks truck full of cash, I wouldn't be surprised if 80% of open source projects sell

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

I don't know why everyone is so upset about the NDA thing... It's such a standard business practice. Whenever I (a mid tier infra engineer at a mid sized software company) needed to talk to a vendor, get a product demo/consultation, get support on a licensed application, etc... We either sent an NDA to that company or bad one on file already with them. Nobody discusses internal processes, policies or roadmaps with an outside contact without an NDA first. It's literally just a standard business practice.

It could be nefarious, since it's meta afterall, but I wouldn't be shocked if there's thousands of people/companies who have standing NDAs with meta just so they could come on campus and demo their product to some team

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 18 points 1 year ago

I've replaced some "non replaceable" batteries in phones before... Only to find that after about 5 years of medium use the flash storage goes to shit (which causes massive slow downs), the chips begin to desolder themselves, the USB port gets janky and stops charging, etc.

Batteries are a great first step, but damn these $1000+ devices just are not built to last more than 3 years

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Idk. I'm conflicted on this. While I agree... For bigger/broader topics, I can definitely see that the quality of discussion and the repetition of topic is already really bad for smaller/niche communities.

When the subreddit had maybe 2k subs worldwide, and now is comprised of 50 subs spread across 3 instances... It's rough. That community is just dead and that sucks.

I guess I'd rather have one centralized community on one big (yet open source) instance where I know we can leave and move again, than have the community just die entirely

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not that they're for this specifically... It's that they are self centered. They're the same 75% of the population that is willing to cross the picket line at Starbucks cuz they want their coffee. They don't think about the workers rights, they only care about coffee.

The same people just want memes and football and porn. They don't care about what's behind the scenes unless it directly impacts them. And let's be honest, the reddit changes (for now) impact like 10% of reddits user base. That's not enough for them to give up some dumb memes for

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

It's just amazing really. Had they rolled out a reasonable rated plan, and maybe even a discount to highly known apps, and even set a "the price will go up each 6 months for the next 2 years till we reach this higher, but still reasonable price"... All the apps would have added a subscription model for like $0.99 a month and none of us would have really complained.

Like, honestly most of us would have paid and maybe grumbled slightly but said "that's the cost of maintaining this huge community, and I get more than $0.99 in value from it" and just kept shit posting on Reddit all day.

If they wanted to block AI models, limit the API keys to only well known apps or those that are manually verified to be not-an-AI by reddit admins.

It's amazing how dumb a corporation can be sometimes (or has some nefarious endgame ala Twitter)

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Second the bokashi method. As a composter in Minnesota, we stay pretty cold for quite a long time. I swapped to bokashi in my basement and ferment a ton over the winter. Once its finished, I dump it into a large container outside to freeze for the winter, and in the spring either direct bury into my garden beds that like a huge dose of fertilization, or put it into my hot pile to jumpstart for the spring (it heats up a pile sooooo fast).

I personally don't feed bokashi to my worms because

  • it stinks (normally its sealed in an air-tight bucket so you can't smell it... feeding it to worms exposes it)
  • the worms can't eat that volume (bokashi can ferment anything, so everything goes in; meat, dairy, citrus, etc. Between my wife and I we ended the winter with over 30 gallons of very finely chopped material fermented... which was probably 100+ pounds in total)
  • the worms don't like the acidity. Bokashi is anaerobic fermentation, which produces acidic compounds, and it takes ages to adjust your worms to that PH and going slightly too heavy on a feeding can cause a mass worm escape, since the acid will absorb and distribute throughout the soil (they can't really escape by just balling in a corner)
[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Yes. If you run the server, then you are the source of truth of that community. All other servers that federate your community query your server to access the community and show it to their users.

So if you run a server and a community explodes there, you might only have 500 users on your instance, but you might have 50k users reading that community and interacting with it from other Lemmy instances, thus your server needs to scale to 50k users worth.

And ever more essential, your server is the source of truth of that community. So if your server is hacked or corrupted or deleted, that community is gone. Other instances don't mirror it (except for temporary caching), so the Lemmy network essentially is a trust network of other people maintaining servers long term (and each inventing a monetary system to pay for it). I still think the network might be better than a centralized system like reddit, but it definitely has a lot of growing and policies that need to be sorted out very soon

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

That's my issue. Loads of very niche subreddits that are the opposite of technical (gardening and plants and stuff). So the users will never switch... It took 5+ years to build those communities up in the first place.

But I popped back in to check today, and they're all back open and the users are terrible, just ranting against the blackout and licking reddits boot like crazy. So it makes me sad to lose those communities and all that information, but if thats the quality of the userbase... I can't bring myself to go back.

You'd think there'd be overlap between organic gardening, or NoLawns, or homesteading that would click with the federated, less capitalistic Lemmy... But nope.

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

The downside to individual servers, and micro-communities, is the cost and maintenance of lemmy instance. Its more scalable, reliable and cheaper to have a bunch of relatively low-churn communities exist on one bigger instance.

The upside is that the rust community gets to own its own data. If programming.dev decides to shut down tomorrow, and posts and comments made there are gone. Lemmy doesn't mirror or cache... all that data lives solely on the server ran by somebody.

I'd vote lemmyrs at least for now until a governance and stability model is figured out to ensure these conversations don't go into /dev/null like /r/rust (sort of) did.

If say the Linux Foundation or a similarly large open source foundation (Apache, FSF, OSI, etc) decided to host a larger "open source" server, I'd consider moving there to improve discoverability and lessen the burden on the rust community itself

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

A much better use of resources, but you shard the data amongst potentially untrusted hosts (ie, anybody can stand up a lemmy instance and start hosting posts/comments, and then get sick of hosting it and delete their instance and all the uploaded data).

Federation only allows access to the network of servers, it doesn't protect the data at all, which means at any moment an entire community of useful historical information could just be wiped away (especially since there's currently no monetary incentive to continue hosting, its only being done out of desire to be part of the network).

I guess I'd rather see the blockchain (or simpler caching/mirroring) approach, something like the torrent network, so that no single person has access to delete content. We can all choose to not view or not mirror content we don't agree with, but nobody can single-handedly own or modify the data

[-] veaviticus@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

What's really the difference between a federated Lemmy instance for hosting vs a 3rd party anyways?

If another Lemmy instance goes down, all the content on it is gone anyways. Federated != Mirrored. Just because you can browse the content doesn't mean it's safe from going away at the whims of one person

view more: next ›

veaviticus

joined 1 year ago