[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Of course, there were good things which came out of the communist regime, but I wouldn't say that "it worked".

[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The people supported the economic system that had free healthcare and education, doubled life expectancies, dramatic improvements in science, made it to space, rapidly industrialized, and dramatically reduced inequality.

Free healthcare still exists in all developed countries other than the US, life expectancies increased all over the world same with improvements in science, the space race was very close between the USSR and the US and the moon landing is very often brought up by US nationalists as well. I would say the industrialization was actually a bit too fast, people were, sometimes forcefully, relocated from rural areas to concrete boxes in cities. As for inequality, yes, there were no billionaires, and, while the quality of life for the poorest was maybe higher than it is today, I'd say the quality of life for average people was lower during communist time.

Even prisoners were paid in the USSR for forced labor, this is ahistorical.

While this may have been true at the beginning, later on, there were no wages. Still, conditions were very poor.

[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Furthermore, the vast majority of people voted to retain the USSR

Wow, you're telling me the people who were brainwashed into believing their country is the best (not saying it doesn't happen nowadays (cough cough USA), voted to retain it?

In my country (Romania) the only point I hear people praising the communist regime about is infrastructure. Why? Because, as it turns out, it's much easier to build infrastructure when you have ~~slaves~~ prisoners which you don't have to pay. Of course, the corruption in our post-communist government doesn't help either.

I agree, capitalism is VERY far from ideal, but, please, stop glazing the USSR regime just because it was "communist".

[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Tell this to the people from the former USSR/Eastern Block. I'm not saying communism can't work in any way, but I am saying that, at least historically, it has not worked.

[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 month ago

Yes, but "Wayland is trash and will never be better than X" is also misinformation.

[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 month ago

It looks like if you park your car in the driveway you get twice the space in the house.

[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 month ago

I'm considering switching to LibreWolf after all the AI crap Mozilla is adding

[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 month ago

AI shit alone, I never understood the urge to build a whole OS in the browser. I want my browser to view websites. If I want more, then I can install extensions. I'd rather them release this as some sort of "official" extension. Might switch to LibreWolf (do you have any other suggestions?)

[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 month ago

Weird, because I'm pretty sure all other mice can be used forever, as long as they don't break.

540
You are wrong. (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 9 months ago by thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz to c/memes@lemmy.ml
12

I seriously don't get it. Why do people expect to be able to get the most powerful enchantment in the game with just a a villager, a lectern, a book and some emeralds? And it's not even that hard to get WITH the changes. Swamps aren't that rare (even if they were, IT'S THE MOST POWERFUL ENCHANTMENT IN THE GAME), and getting 2 villagers there shouldn't be too hard once you build a nether tunnel.

But what gets me the most is people saying this new approach is too grindy. How is exploring your world to find a swamp biome grindy? How is leveling up A SINGLE villager to Master (I think) grindy? Probably the one part of this to be even close to "grindy" is getting the villagers to a swamp, but it's not that hard. It should require some effort to get the best enchantment.

Yes, you'll need to ACTUALLY EXPLORE YOUR WORLD to get easy enchants. Yes you'll need to ACTUALLY TRADE WITH YOUR VILLAGERS to get easy enchants. This is actually ELIMINATING some RNG. You no longer have to spam Lecterns. You have to PUT THE FREAKING WORK IN and get the villager to Master level. But then it's GUARANTEED you get a Mending book.

Please tell me if I'm missing something that would make this whole rant pointless.

[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 year ago

Why are people saying this is a hypersurveillance dystopian nightmare? Guys, you are still in public! The only difference between this and having police officers sitting there and looking is this is much cheaper and more efficient. The recordings are still being sent to a human being for review.

29
[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 year ago

Here's the thing with Arch-based distros: they aren't more stable than Arch, and Arch breaks. Fixing Arch is often possible, but requires Terminal skills. You mentioned you want Arch because of the AUR, why not try Distrobox? It's a tool for integrating containers (and their apps) with the "base" system. With a few commands, create an Arch container, then just use your favourite AUR wrapper (like yay or pacman) as you would on a regular Arch system and you may need to run `distrobox-export ' in the container. Your apps will just show up like any other apps.

80
[-] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 81 points 1 year ago

Unpatchable

Good to hear

48
231
submitted 1 year ago by thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz to c/linux@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

thegreenguy

joined 1 year ago