[-] spaceribs@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

IE in the 2000's called, it wants it's dream back.

Between this, hobbling adblockers and performing enough monopolistic acts to warrant swift government action, I really see this more as Chrome dying than the web itself.

[-] spaceribs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No oldies remember Camino? It was such a great browser!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camino_(web_browser)

[-] spaceribs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You've just been BEAN'D!!! 😱🤣🤫

[-] spaceribs@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

feel free to waste your time and ask anyway!

Are you staring in the sequel to Rampart?

[-] spaceribs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They were always going to do that, the squeeze is basically required if you're planning on making a public offering and become beholden to investors.

[-] spaceribs@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's probably pretty straightforward, if clicks are what they're looking to increase as a metric, then sorting by rising was probably not meeting their expectations in terms of clickrate.

[-] spaceribs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, let me explain:

JSTOR is an online repository where institutions pay a subscription for access to an online library. Aaron Swartz worked to download the entire online library to ensure that it could be provided to all for free. I think it's safe to say that if he were alive today, he would be very much against the actions of his former co-founder, and would be leading the charge.

6
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by spaceribs@lemmy.world to c/reddit@lemmy.world

[caption] I wonder how Aaron Swartz would feel about /u/spez's actions in the past few weeks? Would the Admins care to elaborate?

Considering that Reddit now wants to become the new JSTOR, it seems appropriate that we bring up the clear parallels between our current situation and that of the late founder? [/caption]

spaceribs

joined 1 year ago