3
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml to c/moretankie196@lemmygrad.ml
0
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml to c/comradeship@lemmygrad.ml
1
Type 59 Rule (youtu.be)
56
29
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

Say hi! Fascists before you get blown up by dongfengs!

0

There is r/meth. A subreddit LITERALLY dedicated to meth, a dangerous addictived substances. And then theres r/GenUsa, subreddit that actually advocates to bomb brown children and supports us imperialism. Reddit quarantined soon-banned r/GenZedong. But not banned r/GenUsa and r/meth.

Srsly fuck reddit

2
Reactionaries Rule (lemmygrad.ml)
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

Im gonna be honest. Its going to be weird seeing li without the label from onwards tho...

EDIT : Chen Also got his label removed too...

0
1
0

Folks, the bourgeois, they’re no good, more and more people are saying it. All these workers— the biggest, we have the biggest workers— very handsome workers come up to me and say, Comrade Trump there is a specter haunting Europe, and you know what, they’re right. These bourgeois are very nasty people, very very rude, and very unfair to the workers. They are stealing our surplus value and no one is doing anything about it. The proletariat comes up to me every day and says, Comrade Trump will you lead the revolution? And I gotta turn to them and say look, the instruments of capitalism will be used to bring about its destruction, believe me. The means of production, Obama never wanted to seize them. Well guess what? I’m seizing them. Landlords? They’re done for folks. Everyone told me— they said, Comrade Trump you won’t be the vanguard of the revolution and they would laugh, the media laughed the democrats laughed, guess who’s laughing now?

[-] soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum."#

view more: next ›

soekarnoenjoyer

joined 2 years ago