[-] rigor@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I can appreciate analog and/or specialized tools. I think typewriters, film cameras, watches, etc. are all fascinating. I might enjoy engaging with them. However, a low end Android is cheaper more accessible to most, assuming limited finances and/or no inheritance of such items. 'Everything machines' can be a boon for those individuals by means of concentrating utility and reducing cost. Evidently, capitalism nonetheless creates issues with this, as others have correctly discussed.

I would say that in China, one uses smartphones for neerly everything, even more so than in the global north. This is for various reasons, but it does have practically since all you ever need will be in your phone, including wallet and keys. This does make the development of HarmonyOS by Huawei very interesting. It may abate some of the current issues, especially given that I believe the OS is open source.

[-] rigor@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

That would help the economic situation in the imperial core... At least for the bourgeoisie.

[-] rigor@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Small aside, China has an extensive regular speed train network. Trains are still rather fast, but obviously slower than HSR. It is very beneficial to have both, as the slower trains are quite a bit cheaper. China has a large population, and many people take the regular train, even with standing tickets. These trains move a lot of people and are an important part of the transit system. Sometimes it feels like an inter-city metro since you can take trains at any time to any city.

1
submitted 1 year ago by rigor@lemmygrad.ml to c/china@lemmygrad.ml

Wholesome solidarity; hope this improves your day.

1
submitted 1 year ago by rigor@lemmygrad.ml to c/china@lemmygrad.ml

Huge implications for urban planning, also these sorts of developments in tech and adoption/application nageate declining populations. In fact, this sort of automation will probably be the core of the 4th industrial revolution.

1
submitted 2 years ago by rigor@lemmygrad.ml to c/china@lemmygrad.ml

An article explaining the composition and functions of a principle Chinese governmental organ, which has opened its national session today.

It shows there is still work to be done, but also that China does have a democratic model that is consultative and has mechanisms for dread back from the population.

1
submitted 2 years ago by rigor@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzhou@lemmygrad.ml

The west, the global north, developed countries, the imperial core. I understand and am aware of some of the etymological differences between these words, but what is their difference in practical terms?

It seems that from a Marxist perspective these are one and the same, all designate the same grouping. I hear the west the most often in Lemmygrad, but which term is the most precise, or which might be the best to use?

I'd like to hear your perspectives and analysis.

1
submitted 2 years ago by rigor@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzhou@lemmygrad.ml

Hello Comrades, I hope you are doing well today.

I would like to ask what is the relation between entrepreneurship and innovation in the economy, and in terms of what a company itself may develop—from a Marxist perspective. Also, what influences the leaders of companies to make decisions related to or bolstering innovation?

This is related to coursework in a Chinese university, so the more detailed the better!

rigor

joined 2 years ago