I think the biggest thing here is the hazard ratio

As you say 1.0 is literally nothing. Most say anything below 2.0 shows random chance, and real signals are well over 10.0

I can't be arsed looking up the paper, by chance was its data pulled from FFQ? Ah, I see you mentioned the Nurses study, so that's a yes. Not just a FFQ, but the poster child for the low quality of FFQs

Thanks mate! (This is me on the PC, it defaults to lemm.ee where phone defaults to aussie.zone)