technically both, but “dei” became a mostly racist dogwhistle.
eta: also, people rarely express only a single type of prejudice.
this is quite infuriating, i had a number of mozilla/firefox people telling me that this feature wouldn't work with opt-in (it's bullshit though) because too few users would enable it, and neither fucker asked himself : “wait, if we're afraid we can't convince our user base to buy-in, perhaps we shouldn't develop the feature?”
logarythmically… what?
A.S. in Engineering, A.S. in Computer Science
wait, wait. that's basically the bootcamp level of education, no?
it's not darwinism, what you're playing with is casual eugenics (you clearly don't value life of certain – arbitrarily chosen – people, and are fine with them suffering harm); don't. there's nothing good waiting for you on that path.
ah, a civility connoisseur.
if i wouldn't know from @titotal@awful.systems that it's undoubtfully a manor house, i'd think it's a fucking castle.
(btw, did we ever hear back from the person after they decided to go full tescreal on their popular website?)
huh. the modlog is wild. my commiserations.
actively investing in shell and actively investing in crypto is unethical and it's not wrong to point it out, and neither is this moral panic; if you don't want to be subjected to ethical assessment, don't brag about potentially unethical behaviour.
mawhrin
joined 2 years ago
it was always a risk; questioning someone's integrity, be it directly or indirectly, is rarely welcomed.
needless to say, i'm even less inclined to resume any activity on reddit.