nostr neatly covers all obsessions of dorsey. it's literally fash-tech (original dev, fiatjaf, is a right-wing nutjob; and current development is driven by alex gleason of the truth dot social fame), deliberately designed to be impossible to moderate (“censorship-resilient”); the place is full of fascists, promptfondlers and crypto dudes.

such an excellent nazi bar they have there.

no, no, it's fine. the less readable they are, the better.

dear me. doesn't he know that the actual art requires hate-skimming at most?

you do not have much medical knowledge, do you?

so now we have confirmation that tracing w. is (a) a petty, vengeful prick and (b) reads this; good. tracing, whoever you are, why don't you focus on some introspection, like consider what causes you to agree with obvious anti-scientific crap (scientific racism, hbd) and why do you prefer the company of fascists (proto, wannabe, true, disguised, and the illinois nazis) to the company of people who don't think genocide can be justified for any reason?

she's literally paid from an EA grant for the work at vox, so she can hardly compromise her journalistic ethics more.

i'm not doing databases for living but the idea of stringifying a perfectly cromulent unique number in order to store it in the database comes as slightly weird to me.

i implore the tech nerds to learn a modicum of biology before making very confident statements.

their mistake, as usual, is not grokking that genuine human interactions might be ritualised, but are not rituals.

i wonder if they realise how thick with internal jargon their language is, and how highly ritualised.

most of the variance in the genome is linear in nature, by which I mean the effect of a gene doesn’t usually depend on which other genes are present

that person seems homeschooled on absolute bullshit; basic high school biology course thirty-odd years ago was saying otherwise.