no, no, it's fine. the less readable they are, the better.
you do not have much medical knowledge, do you?
so now we have confirmation that tracing w. is (a) a petty, vengeful prick and (b) reads this; good. tracing, whoever you are, why don't you focus on some introspection, like consider what causes you to agree with obvious anti-scientific crap (scientific racism, hbd) and why do you prefer the company of fascists (proto, wannabe, true, disguised, and the illinois nazis) to the company of people who don't think genocide can be justified for any reason?
that atleson person is absolutely first class sneerer.
she's literally paid from an EA grant for the work at vox, so she can hardly compromise her journalistic ethics more.
i'm not doing databases for living but the idea of stringifying a perfectly cromulent unique number in order to store it in the database comes as slightly weird to me.
i implore the tech nerds to learn a modicum of biology before making very confident statements.
what does the dystopia maker peddle these days now that the nfts and crypto are failing?
their mistake, as usual, is not grokking that genuine human interactions might be ritualised, but are not rituals.
i have not enough energy to check if that was mentioned before, but anyways it's a good reminder: the whole cozy enterprise is, indeed, not a registered tax-exempt organisation, and none of the threee nonlinears returned by the irs search engine does seem to have anything in common with the nonlinear dot org.
i wonder if they realise how thick with internal jargon their language is, and how highly ritualised.
such an excellent nazi bar they have there.