I'll also add that I'm aware of glibc's stance on dynamic linking from static binaries. I don't buy the whole NSS argument. It's easily solvable by a basic request/response protocol through some local socket. IMO that argument is just a cheap excuse to justify status quo.
Update: it was a bit of work but should be working now :) Drag the Level.sav
file from %LOCALAPPDATA%\Pal\Saved\SaveGames\
onto the page and it should load all of your Pals automatically. Thanks for the tip!
This restriction is meant to protect high definition content from being ripped by pirates. Open systems don't offer the same DRM guarantees as the locked ones.
Problem znaleziony! Lemmy ma limit 200 znaków na tytuł posta. Wersja 0.18.5 (na lemmy.world) zamienia znaki &
na &
. Wersja 0.18.1 (na szmer.info) tego nie robi. Dlatego post na szmerze wrzucił się bez problemu (tytuł miał 198 znaków), ale lemmy.world odrzuciło go przez zbyt długi tytuł.
In terms of types of users I agree with what you're saying but I also think that there are some shades of gray in between. There are people who love to tinker and would manually configure every service on their router, compiling everything from scratch, reading manuals, understanding how things work (they'll probably choose dnsmasq
, systemd-networkd
, graphana
over Gatekeeper). In my experience this approach is pretty exciting for the first couple of years & then gradually becomes more and more troublesome. I think Gatekeeper's target audience are the people who would like to take ownership of their network (and have some theoretical understanding) but don't want to fully dive into the rabbit's hole and configure everything manually.
In terms of problem solved: I agree that Gatekeeper solves a similar problem. I think it's different from those projects because it tightly integrates all of the home gateway functions. While this goes against the Unix philosophy, I think it creates some advantages:
- Possibility of cross-cutting features.
- Better performance (lower disk usage, lower RAM usage, lower CPU load).
- Seamless integration.
Functions of home routers are conventionally spread out over many components (kernel & a bunch of independently developed userspace tools) which talk to each other. Whenever we want to create a cross-cutting feature (for example live traffic graphs) we must coordinate work between many components. We need to create kernel APIs to notify userspace apps about new traffic, create userspace apps to maintain a record of this traffic & a web interface to display it. It's difficult organizationally. In a monolith, where all code is in one place, such cross-cutting features can be developed with less friction.
From the performance point the conventional approach is also less efficient. The tools must talk to each other. Quite often through files (logs & databases). It's wearing down SSDs & causing CPU load that could be otherwise avoided. A tightly integrated monolith needs to write files only periodically (if ever) - because all data can be exchanged through RAM.
From the complexity standpoint the conventional approach is also not great because each of the tools needs to know how to talk with the others. This is usually done by administrator, configuring every service according to its manual. When everything is built together as a monolith, things can "just work" and no configuration is necessary.
Edit: Please don't be offended by my verbosity. From your question I see that you know this stuff already but I'm also answering to the fresh "selfhosted" audience :)
There are a few proofs against existence of god. Ineffectiveness of prayer. Impossibility of miracles under controlled conditions. Biological nature of human cognition which precludes life after death.
Atheism is more valid though and there is an abundance of proof.
From biology we know there is no life after death which disproves most religions. From experiments we also know that praying doesn't affect physical world. None of the known miracles couod have been reproduced under controlled conditions which makes it likely they are all made up or hallucinated.
I don't think the OP meant to discount opinions of "anyone that disagrees with him" but rather to discount the opinions based in supernatural.
It also doesn't seem to me that the OP is really interested in "forced reeducation" but rather reducing influence - probably through ridicule, deplatforming or similar actions.
Oh, this the exact use case for a tool that I'm writing right now! It's a daemon that runs on the gateway and acts as a DNS + DHCP + Firewall to monitor the activity of IoT devices.
https://github.com/mafik/gatekeeper
In the 1.6 (expected next weekend) I'm adding traffic graphs for each device and remote domain that it talks to.
Negligence generally stems from convenience or incompetence. I don't know which is worse.
In programming backslash can sometimes be used to enter special characters. Maybe Lemmy also follows this syntax? If so, typing two consecutive backslashes might help.
Test with one backslash:
Test with two backslashes: \
I'm honestly surprised by the negative sentiment here. Government certified digital identity is the obvious solution to spam & online disinformation. In the short term bot farms will lose the ability to influence social media. In the long term it'll allow us to distinguish real people from AI agents, true scientists from pseudo-scientists, actual journalists from state-sponsored fake-news spreaders. It's a key technology that fediverse needs to survive in a world flooded by AI content. Finally it's something that can save democracy from literally falling apart. Remember that democracy only works if citizens are well informed. Otherwise those who control the information are the true rulers.
It's also complete bullshit that third party ROMs can't get proper attestations. It's a statement literally made up by the OP. Third part ROMs can get the keys. They just need to go through the attestation process (which BTW can be fully automated) and publish signed images for users.
Don't like the existing integrity providers (Google, Apple)? Make your own. The system is designed to be flexible and not rely on single integrity providers. Or tell us how else you'd like to solve these serious and growing problems.
Sorry for the rant-y comment. I'm tired of people who only complain and nitpick.