The myth that talking about bubbles prevents bubbles for when someone starts saying some “oh but everyone says AI is a bubble which must mean its not”
REALLY? LMFAOOOOO
Did it actually solve this one or did it just find a pre-existing solution like it did the last time?
Huh, interesting. Those slogans are also rather “interesting”
”we need better messengers”
Is he realising that showing up to a debate in a sparkly fedora and goggles is not going to make people take him seriously?
The marketing mentions “a sprinkling of AI experts” even though Yud’s position on Twitter is that he is not an AI expert.
wait really? He actually said he's not an expert?
AI CEOs Baffled by Hatred of Their Technology
"Why do people hate us so much? We only constantly say the technology we're making is dangerous and then block regulation, suck up resources, commit mass theft and plagiarism, threatened to destabilise the economy, enabled more CSAM, caused widespread mental health issues and multiple suicides, unleashed a barrage of slop, engaged in mass surveillance and mocked people against the tech? Don't they know AI is the future and will create a utopia where we all live in a simulation in space?"
I'm curious to know the % of rationalist vs non-rationalist ratings for it
I know. We can dream though
This from a while ago but I forgot about it until today: Eliezer jumpscare in this interview about Absolute Scarecrow (its very brief but is there)
on the topic of EY's book, the ratings on Goodreads have slowly crept down (from 3.97 to 3.92)
and on the topic of ratings, the AI Doc has also gone down to an 6.9 on IMDB
Can’t find the exact post rn but I remember an AI yt channel (im 90% sure it was the AISpecies guy) using this as proof that ASI is imminent, and conveniently left out the part at the end where they say this does not indicate that AI is now a general-purpose alignment scientist (and also left out the link to the sources in numerous posts iirc so no one could fact check him easily)