[-] jdp23 9 points 11 months ago

Happy cake day -- congrats, and thanks for all you and Kaity do!

[-] jdp23 9 points 1 year ago

Totally agree. Back in June I wrote about the reasons the FediPact was good strategy and started it with

Most importantly, it counters the gaslighting that resistance is futile. The segment of the fediverse that wants to reject Meta is clearly large enough that it will survive no matter what the big Mastodon instances and pundits do.

[-] jdp23 9 points 1 year ago

Agreed that figuring out the right action is important! It's clear from the conversation so far that a lot of instances are going to defederate, and a lot of instances are going to federate, so any strategy needs to take that into account.

I talked with a lot of people about this when I wrote Should the Fediverse welcome its new surveillance-capitalism overlords? Opinions differ! and don't think it's the case that we share the same goals. Some people see increasing the size of the ActivityPub network as a goal in and of itself (and generally support federation); others are in the fediverse because they want nothing to do with Facebook or Meta (so unsurprisingly support defederation). And some people have a goal of communicating with people on Threads -- friends, relatives, celebrities, etc; others don't. So again, these different goals are something to take into account.

Wanting to stay federated DOES NOT mean the user wants to help Meta or thinks that Meta is here for our benefit.

That's correct, but many of the people I've seen arguing in favor of federation do seem to think Meta's looking for a win/win situation where the fediverse benefits as much or more than Meta. And conversely many would argue that wanting to stay federated means the user is helping Meta whether they want to or not.

[-] jdp23 9 points 1 year ago

Yes, followers-only posts are public -- upvote if you agree!

33
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/1835889

Evan Greer of Fight for the Future:

"If KOSA were actually a privacy bill as its supporters claim, we would be all about it," Greer told Ars. "We support cracking down on tech companies harvesting of data, we support an end to manipulative business practices like autoplay, infinite scroll, intrusive notifications, and algorithmic recommendations powered by commercial surveillance. What we don't support is a bill that gives state attorneys general the power to dictate what content younger people can see on social media. That's where KOSA goes off the rails and becomes a censorship bill, rather than a privacy bill."

If you're in the US, you can contact Congress using https://www.stopkosa.com/

31
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/politics@beehaw.org

Evan Greer of Fight for the Future:

"If KOSA were actually a privacy bill as its supporters claim, we would be all about it," Greer told Ars. "We support cracking down on tech companies harvesting of data, we support an end to manipulative business practices like autoplay, infinite scroll, intrusive notifications, and algorithmic recommendations powered by commercial surveillance. What we don't support is a bill that gives state attorneys general the power to dictate what content younger people can see on social media. That's where KOSA goes off the rails and becomes a censorship bill, rather than a privacy bill."

If you're in the US, you can contact Congress using https://www.stopkosa.com/

11
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/1560280

The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) is a bipartisan bill that lawmakers say is intended to stop online platforms from targeting and recommending harmful content to minors. It sounds good but it's supported by a slew of far-right, anti-LGBTQ organizations, and opponents are warning it will enable states to censor LGBTQ content by claiming it leads kids to depression, anxiety, and eating disorders.

If you're in the US, EFF has a page that makes it easy to Tell Congress: KOSA Will Censor the Internet But Won't Help Kids

And once you've done that, please consider calling your Senators and tell them to oppose the Kids Online Safety Act because it won't help keep kids safe and it'll harm LGBTQ teens. Here's a list of Senators' phone numbers.

103
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org

The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) is a bipartisan bill that lawmakers say is intended to stop online platforms from targeting and recommending harmful content to minors. It sounds good but it's supported by a slew of far-right, anti-LGBTQ organizations, and opponents are warning it will enable states to censor LGBTQ content by claiming it leads kids to depression, anxiety, and eating disorders.

If you're in the US, EFF has a page that makes it easy to Tell Congress: KOSA Will Censor the Internet But Won't Help Kids

And once you've done that, please consider calling your Senators and tell them to oppose the Kids Online Safety Act because it won't help keep kids safe and it'll harm LGBTQ teens. Here's a list of Senators' phone numbers.

15
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/1170157

KOSA, the "Kids Online Safety Act", sounds good. Who doesn't want to keep kids safe? But as over 90 LGBTQ and human rights organizations said last year, KOSA would harm LGBTQ+ youth especially, and could be weaponized by Attorneys General to censor online resources and information for queer and trans youth, people seeking reproductive healthcare, and more.

And it's not just a hypothetical concern! This article from a couple months ago includes a screenshot of a Heritage Foundation tweet talking about how they'll KOSA to attack trans-related content -- because after all, they think that censoring trans-related content is "protecting kids".

So if you're in the US, please contact your Senators and ask them to oppose KOSA.

  • EFF has a handy web form

  • if you prefer the phone, you can call the US Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. The bill number is S. 1409. Your message doesn't have to be fancy: "KOSA won't keep kids safe" is enough if they're Republicans; if they're Democrats you can add "and it will harm LGBTQ+ teens".

  • or, https://resist.bot/ lets you contact your legislators by texting or using Messenger, Apple Messages, WhatsApp .

10
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/1170157

KOSA, the "Kids Online Safety Act", sounds good. Who doesn't want to keep kids safe? But as over 90 LGBTQ and human rights organizations said last year, KOSA would harm LGBTQ+ youth especially, and could be weaponized by Attorneys General to censor online resources and information for queer and trans youth, people seeking reproductive healthcare, and more.

And it's not just a hypothetical concern! This article from a couple months ago includes a screenshot of a Heritage Foundation tweet talking about how they'll KOSA to attack trans-related content -- because after all, they think that censoring trans-related content is "protecting kids".

So if you're in the US, please contact your Senators and ask them to oppose KOSA.

  • EFF has a handy web form

  • if you prefer the phone, you can call the US Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. The bill number is S. 1409. Your message doesn't have to be fancy: "KOSA won't keep kids safe" is enough if they're Republicans; if they're Democrats you can add "and it will harm LGBTQ+ teens".

  • or, https://resist.bot/ lets you contact your legislators by texting or using Messenger, Apple Messages, WhatsApp .

[-] jdp23 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah really. Think of the children!!!!

75
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jdp23 to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org

KOSA, the "Kids Online Safety Act", sounds good. Who doesn't want to keep kids safe? But as over 90 LGBTQ and human rights organizations said last year, KOSA would harm LGBTQ+ youth especially, and could be weaponized by Attorneys General to censor online resources and information for queer and trans youth, people seeking reproductive healthcare, and more.

And it's not just a hypothetical concern! This article from a couple months ago includes a screenshot of a Heritage Foundation tweet talking about how they'll KOSA to attack trans-related content -- because after all, they think that censoring trans-related content is "protecting kids".

So if you're in the US, please contact your Senators and ask them to oppose KOSA.

  • EFF has a handy web form

  • if you prefer the phone, you can call the US Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. The bill number is S. 1409. Your message doesn't have to be fancy: "KOSA won't keep kids safe" is enough if they're Republicans; if they're Democrats you can add "and it will harm LGBTQ+ teens".

  • or, https://resist.bot/ lets you contact your legislators by texting or using Messenger, Apple Messages, WhatsApp .

222
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/1163015

EFF writes:

KOSA has laudable goals, but it also presents significant unintended consequences that threaten the privacy, safety, and access to information rights of young people and adults alike. Teenagers already understand that this sweeping legislation is more about censorship than safety. Now we just need to make sure Congress does, as well.

Take action! If you're in the US, Use EFF's page to Tell Congress: KOSA Will Censor the Internet But Won't Help Kids

And please help get the word out! Four ways to hep:

  1. Cross-post this link to communities and magazines where it's on-topic
  2. Upvote and share the other links in !bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org
  3. If you're on Mastodon, check out the #KOSA hashtag and boost the posts you see there
  4. Tell your friends on other social networks as well.
1
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/BadInternetBills@kbin.social

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/1146007

If you're on kbin, Mastodon, Firefish, or some other fediverse platform that lets you follow people, here's some relevant accounts for this campaign -- and for other digitial rights issues.

The reply has suggestions for European advocates and organizations.

3
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/BadInternetBills@kbin.social

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/1138165

Coverage of the week of action in Common Dreams, with quotes from @evangreer@mastodon.online of Fight for the Future.

If you want to help, here are four easy ways:

  1. If you live in the US, contact your legislators using Fight for the Future’s https://www.badinternetbills.com/
  2. Upvote and boost posts in !bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org -- and cross-post them to other communities and magazines where they're on-topic
  3. On Mastodon, boost posts on the #BadInternetBills and #KOSA hashtags
  4. Get the word out on other social networks too
22
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org

Coverage of the week of action in Common Dreams, with quotes from @evangreer@mastodon.online of Fight for the Future.

If you want to help, here are four easy ways:

  1. If you live in the US, contact your legislators using Fight for the Future’s https://www.badinternetbills.com/
  2. Upvote and boost posts in !bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org -- and cross-post them to other communities and magazines where they're on-topic
  3. On Mastodon, boost posts on the #BadInternetBills and #KOSA hashtags
  4. Get the word out on other social networks too
4
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/BadInternetBills@kbin.social

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/1101954

The "Kids Online Safety Act" (KOSA) is one of the Bad Internet Bills EFF is asking for help trying to stop. KOSA sounds like a good bill. Who doesn't want kids to be safe online? But KOSA wouldn't actually make kids safer -- and the way it's written would be especially harmful to LGBTQIA2S+ people.

As over 90 Human Rights and LGBTQ groups said in this letter the sent to Congress last year opposing KOSA:

"KOSA establishes a burdensome, vague “duty of care” to prevent harms to minors for a broad range of online services that are reasonably likely to be used by a person under the age of 17. While KOSA’s aims of preventing harassment, exploitation, and mental health trauma for minors are laudable, the legislation is unfortunately likely to have damaging unintended consequences for young people.

KOSA would require online services to “prevent” a set of harms to minors, which is effectively an instruction to employ broad content filtering to limit minors’ access to certain online content. Content filtering is notoriously imprecise; filtering used by schools and libraries in response to the Children’s Internet Protection Act has curtailed access to critical information such as sex education or resources for LGBTQ+ youth. Online services would face substantial pressure to over-moderate, including from state Attorneys General seeking to make political points about what kind of information is appropriate for young people.

At a time when books with LGBTQ+ themes are being banned from school libraries and people providing healthcare to trans children are being falsely accused of “grooming,” KOSA would cut off another vital avenue of access to information for vulnerable youth."

KOSA has.a markup session in the Senate next week, so now's a critical time to be telling Congress that we don't want this bad internet bill. So please help get the word out -- and if you're in the US, EFF's KOSA action page makes it easy to contact Congress

#BadInternetBills #KOSA #privacy

[-] jdp23 8 points 1 year ago

Agreed, other laws are needed as well as this. The ADPPA consumer privacy bill is likely to get reintroduced later this session; last year's version had some good features but also a lot of weaknesses, and big tech companies and data brokes are pushing to further weaken it. So it'll be a battle to strengthen and pass it.

But ADPPA doesn't apply to government agencies (and that's not likely to change) so bills like Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale are important complements!

[-] jdp23 9 points 1 year ago

Not at all. I talked about this in In chaos there is opportunity! Meta's potential arrival is a likely to be a good thing for the fediverse no matter whether or not they actually go forward with it.

[-] jdp23 10 points 1 year ago

Why is it stupid? The article isn't setting up the tension, it's describing the tension that exists.

[-] jdp23 9 points 2 years ago

💯. The mod tooling is virtually non-existent so there aren’t any other viable options

[-] jdp23 10 points 2 years ago

Yeah as you say it's pretty magical ... although also janky. It really does show the possibilties of federation in a way that mastodon by itself never seemed to. And @stanleytweedle@lemmy.ml great analogy to BBSes!

[-] jdp23 7 points 2 years ago

That's good to hear (although I agree this bug needs to be fixed). A couple of things I ran into when I tried with VoiceOver on a Mac

  • there didn't seem to be a "skip to content" link so I had to skip over the header stuff manually

  • I couldn't figure out how to navigate from reply to reply when reading posts

Not sure if these are bugs, it might just be user confusion on my part!

[-] jdp23 8 points 2 years ago

This is functionliaty I'd also find really valuable.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

jdp23

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF