19
submitted 1 year ago by jdp23 to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

On Mastodon, Followers-only posts are only visible to your followers -- and to admins of any instances your followers on. But if you haven't turned on "approve followes", anybody who's logged in to an instance you haven't blocked can follow you and get access to your followers-only posts.

In your view, are followers-only posts public?

The linked post is a Mastodon poll, and I'll also put in replies here so that you can just upvote the ones you agree with!

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jdp23 9 points 1 year ago

Yes, followers-only posts are public -- upvote if you agree!

[-] 0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Just a heads up: there's a mastodon specific community at https://lemmy.ml/c/mastodon that would be more appropriate for this post.

[-] jdp23 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks, it's a good point!

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !mastodon@lemmy.ml

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Public but not indexed and not in your public profile.

Viewable only by someone with a link to the post or thread.

[-] modulus@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

On my instance, the following control measures apply:

  • Only public posts are visible through the web interface.
  • Only public posts appear on RSS.
  • Following requires approval.
  • Authorised fetch is required.

So I think I have reason to feel fairly strongly that follower only posts are not public, and even unlisted posts are reasonably restricted.

[-] jdp23 4 points 1 year ago

No, followers-only posts are not public -- upvote if you agree!

[-] jdp23 3 points 1 year ago

It depends if I've turned on "approve followers" -- upvote if you agree!

[-] Steve@communick.news 3 points 1 year ago

Anything posted to "Social Media" in any way, I consider public. If you want privacy, you need something that's directly one to one at least, ideally E2EE.

[-] Die4Ever@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

couldn't a malicious instance or fork just ignore who is trying to access the data and show all the toots that have been federated at all? anything that can be retrieved by another instance is public

it's kinda like when Steam asks for your age when looking at an M rated game

[-] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean it’s pretty much the same as Twitter? All your posts are public* and anyone can follow you unless you activate the follower approval option. It’s the first thing I did when I created my Mastodon account. (And the first thing I did on Twitter as well.)

  • Actually now I think about it, on Twitter I also made my account private immediately.
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17845 readers
15 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS