2
1
1
3
4
3
7
11
1
6

Guess we're gonna find out, because AI isn't going to be stopped.

3
10

I haven't seen any this year yet, but we had a very mild winter here, so I'm assuming there will be plenty this season.

OP, this is awesome! Thank you for this!

[-] jamescroll@social.doomprepper.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

ChatGPT prompt: generate image of a group of Lemmy posters meeting up in a group and you can tell that being upset about AI is probably making for some deep discussions. Base it on realistic depictions of Lemmy posters, and make it look candid and unposed. Make sure you have Reddit mixed in there too, because the users overlap a lot. (The latest image creation by ChatGPT is pretty badass. New version came out yesterday.)

8F9jSCMB5UNfz1w.jpg

[-] jamescroll@social.doomprepper.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The Dems should have came up with a better presidential pick then, so they could get all the non-voters motivated. They lost to Trump TWO FUCKING TIMES. That's not Trump voters' fault, that's 100 percent on the Democrats.

But hey at least they can try to pressure ai companies not to be so real so that fucking losers won't fall in love with them!

Dems need to stop bitching about Trump, stop bitching about AI, and work on getting AOC elected as Pres, so she can turn shit around. Or things are gonna get even worse.

[-] jamescroll@social.doomprepper.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So you think LLMs were the problem? Do you think these people wouldn't have done something like this with something else? They use their phone to do it, should we ban phones now?

[-] jamescroll@social.doomprepper.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I stand by my statement. They use their phone to do it, should we ban phones now?

Luckily there are plenty of LLMs that don't, and never will have, guardrails. AI is here to stay, regardless of how upset Lemmy gets about it. :)

[-] jamescroll@social.doomprepper.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If someone is deranged enough to have a mental breakdown with a chatbot, then they were danger of that anyway. I don't think it's a reason to censor and downgrade all chatbots. ChatGPT is almost unusable now because they dialed down everything so much because of the incels that fell in love with their chats.

It's a wonder we ever made it to the moon. Why is everything being more complicated than it was in 1969, when we had LESS tech than we do now?

I actually like this tool. Once code is public, it’s just information. The AI is learning patterns the same way any developer would. Trying to enforce licenses on whatever the model spits out feels like trying to own ideas, and I’m not a fan of that.

I know I'm late to the party, but did you ever find an answer for this question?

view more: next ›

jamescroll

joined 2 months ago