That was before WW2, no less. Funny how after all that happened, people saw that and went, "Yeah that was a good idea."
Or Andrew Jackson.
That's just rich people behavior.
I figure ProPublica and The Lancet doesn't feel the need to write about a Nazi salute we could all see for our own eyes, no investigative journalism necessary.
It is you'll just make them cum.
Clearly they haven't seen famous antifa media like 'Saving Private Ryan', 'Band of Brothers', or 'Come and See' due to those flims being too radical.
It's a step in the right direction, for sure. Still 100% ineffective unless it's an actual billionaire instead of a dummy, then we can start calling it a protest. Anything less is masturbation.
"Hi Jack, bye Jack."
There's no mark of edit, you read it wrong. In your world is it more likely that comment was stealthily editted to dunk on you than simply you being wrong about something?
The apathetic centrist majority who think political illiteracy is the smart and sensible position are the biggest asset to fascism.
A bigger, louder '0' is still equal to 0, but with more wasted effort to boot. The question is why Berliners still like Naziism enough to leave that building standing is what I wonder when they shine a projector on it for a day and call it anything. I would say they're doing a lot more to waste effort, energy, optics, and time than being on lemmy.
Or when you don't realize that it already is directly affecting you because "They pay me well enough to keep me in a comfy box, I don't have time to do anything or read or risk losing my job" while the ones they love are picked off one by one. Then when they come out the other side they go "How did all this happen? It was equally the fault of the radicals on both sides." Thus the unenlightened centrist cycle will continue.