This is really great (and by great I mean terrifying to see it all laid out plainly). The only nitpick is the idea that the model "is coming to europe next" ... as if this whole thing wasn't kicked off by Brexit and the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Europe was the testing bed for this a decade or more ago.
Dude Harvard didn't even stand up to defend their own president Claudine Gay when she needed their backing. They were dead silent during trumps first term when this same shit was going on. It's not just the money. They will literally sit on their asses and say nothing unless they are pushed.
I'd love to see this but her chances are likely worse than Harris. And that's assuming we have an honest election in '28.
The right are perpetually angry. They are angry when they win and angry when they lose. It's a hallmark of their cult. There's no pleasing these people because they don't know what they're angry about, they just prefer to be angry.
If I accidentally carpetbomb my squad I am always quick to reinforce out of guilt 😬
When it's in your:
-
Uterus: Your state has the power to tell you what can be removed.
-
Election Ballot: lol your state has no power to tell you what can be removed.
Nor Politico, Economist, The Guardian. But at least we have Tom's Guide here in case you wondered if Tech guides have a bias...
That's not how helmets work. The outer shell certainly helps mitigate bumps and bangs, but what really protects your head is the styrofoam inner that compresses like an airbag upon impact.
This looks good. PR approved.
Actually it's 50%. Either you win or you don't: 50%.
/s
view more: next ›
ifGoingToCrashDont
joined 2 years ago
Yes folks if there's no organic demand for this glorified party trick we CEOs will just manufacture it by shoving it down your throats