Lol at the sealion in that thread
I'm running Hyprland on my Framework 13 (not doing omarchy cause I'm a NixOS fan,
of course
Lol at the sealion in that thread
I'm running Hyprland on my Framework 13 (not doing omarchy cause I'm a NixOS fan,
of course
One of my favourite musicians, Patricia Taxxon is quite vocal on being against intellectual property, but also that AI people should just be able to scrape everything and put it in their machine. It makes me sad.
Nice, the shift phone is pretty well supported on postmarketos and their choice of firmware looks consumer friendly
A very big problem with this study is that participants that don't delegate are not asked to do anything regarding cheating, while the ones that do are presented with various choices that influence them. "choosing a setting on a dial that ranged from ‘maximize accuracy’ to ‘maximize profit’". In this way, it doesn't "control" for anything.
One of the authors is from the Center for Adaptive Rationality, obviously making a reference to the lesswrong CFAR.
That horse should be the mascot of this instance
Computers use both big endian and little endian and it doesn't seem to matter much. Yet humans should switch their entire number system?
E: this guy can't grasp the concept that left-to-right is arbitrary, which is really ironic given his point. Ok so in arabic it's exactly how this guy wants it, except no, the universally correct reading direction is left-to-right and arabic does it backwards just to be quirky🙄, and humans, just like programs, flip a bit to read it left-to-right, where it's the opposite of how you should be reading it! of course.
Now I'm wondering if an infinite sequence of nested LLMs could achieve AGI. Probably not.
So "unintentional moderates" are those that both choose deliberately to believe in centrist political ideology and to participate in groupthink?
The Wikibooks book on statistics is surprisingly decent. Hopefully it inspires the reader to acknowledge that there are a lot more things to study apart from Bayes.
So perhaps one alternative way to estimate their quality is to check the number of citations, many have more than 100 citations, which is a sign of quality
Andrew Wakefield's 1998 paper has 457 citations on PubMed
lord, this is so cursed, especially the gambling (though you could say all vibe coding is gambling, ha)