Note to studios: there is no amount of potential, unrealised profit that makes it ethical to install malware on another person's computer.
This is a standard way to draw geometric proofs, it's not at all unreasonable to assume straight lines alongside unrepresentative angles. It's certainly still an assumption, but a conventional one.
IMO there are exceptionally few cases where it is acceptable for a QR code to not be immediately adjacent to a textual representation of the same content.
The Minnesota law covers all electronics except cybersecurity tools, video game consoles, cars, medical devices, and farm equipment.
Wow, not to suggest that this bill isn't better than the alternative, but those are some awful exclusions.
A lot of the early right to repair movement came out of farm equipment, and medical devices are the most obvious need for rules like this.
There is an actually moral alternative to opt-out that doesn't have the poor-sampling problem of opt-in: ask for consent explicitly.
I didn't realise dark owls were such a problem for early humanity
Who could have ever guessed that naming different software the same thing would ever come back to bite them
Amazing how different it feels to hear "racially aggravated harassment" vs "called police officer 'stupid white bastard'".
The FTC argued this would happen, it's the court that swallowed Microsoft's tripe. This is the FTC's "I told you, bro!"
The Jobseeker program has always been about punishing the poor. The sudden raise in payments and dropping mutual obligations when "normal" people were ending up on Jobseeker during covid was a blatant demonstration of that.
No. "New moon" is just the night side of the moon facing us. A lunar eclipse is when the Earth blocks sunlight from the moon, which can only occur on a full moon approximately every six months.