[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This needs a pin

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I started with podman and wanted to like it. Ultimately moved to docker because of docker compose

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yooo I had not heard of gothub I've been looking for something like this. I'm assuming it is possible to clone repositories?

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

This is madness. How does this keep getting upvoted when the article has nothing to do with the actual code integrity and functionality of this browser.

At least it's open source, if there is something shady point it out in the code.

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh no. Man that sucks. Which one? The lemur pro by system76 was a clevo I had it for a bit and thought it was really good all around. I would have kept it but the specs on a M1 were just ridiculous compared to anything out there. No fans, no dust collection was something I didn't know I appreciated so much

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Same. Tried it a few years ago and it was bloatware and cluttered. Took another chance on it and really like it, super fast and I can make it as full featured or slim down as I want. I think the company is owned by the workers if I remember correctly. Double check that

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I feel really dumb but I can't find any documentation on his to use it other than instructions on how to install a node

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree. There is a potential barrier to entry, and growth. I argue:

  • people part with money for a cause or belief. Culturally privacy apps are different, inconvenient and unfamiliar UX, there are usually no 'email signups', not run by ads, or sales of data, and the software is free but has a learning curve. People do it anyways because they believe it is right
  • Its not unusual to pay $1-$15 for an app in a mobile app store. At least they can get their money back (it's actually free to use)
  • users can be compensated for 'rich' abusive actor, at the same time incentivised to report in the case of ie chat app
  • A sponsor couls risk their collatoral to allow access to a user who cannot manage the initial financial barrier

The first point is the most important IMHO, privacy users accept the learning curve and inconvenience because they believe privacy is more important and because of this, I believe the burden is not as high as we think, that a 'free to play' alternative means of accessing privacy respecting apps (by this idea or something else) is as as essential to supporting and protecting privacy as E2EE vs server side encryption.

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Yep. I've not tried it yet. Finally came around to playing around with it though. What I noticed is by default it syncs to the backup and I can't figure out how to turn it off yet. That said the files are decrypted locally with the keys made when the account is created. About to look more into the privacy policy.

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Self hosted? Looks like everything runs locally, what is being hosted? Are you talking about the p2p relays?

[-] Twashe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Will need to check the UI and post again. The buzzwords are directly speaking to remote work culture and a migration away from central services. The ecosystem, their plans to make money off that network are an interesting way to get ahead of those market movements. I'm not opposed but I am suspicious of it.

Skiff was kind if a disappointment when it came down to it. Using decentralized storage web3 privacy buzzwords but finding different ways to vendor lock and track.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Twashe

joined 1 year ago