He did. Where he said the article looked AI generated and so he wasn't going to waste any time with it.

The first leg should be short and intrastate. The first step is building any high speed rail at all.

The most important thing is to keep building. Once you stop the knowledge is gone.

Gillard also support Israel.

She was really an awful prime minister. Her legacy has basically been entirely repealed because she sucks at politics and put her own ambition above moving the country forward.

Look, I'm deeply sympathetic to the idea of our political leaders being pragmatic so they can hold on to power and not be replaced by someone worse, but when the cost would be being kicked out of Eurovision then obviously they should go all in.

Operating systems are on the list. You're gonna have to go fully offline.

Guzman Y Gomez constantly has job listings up. I suspect they have hectic conditions and nobody wants to stick around.

You suggest both sides are the same when you say winning is less important than acting symbolically on principle. Principles give you a coalition government. A flagrantly corrupt, shamefully incompetent government, one that will not just do nothing to stop America from owning us but actively seek that out, one that undermines the unions and willfully cheers on extinction, one that's just recently come out with the policy of scrapping net zero.

You may suggest the Greens, but the Greens would 100% lose 9/10 elections if Labor disappeared tomorrow. And the Greens are the actual horrible people. They blocked the HAAF not to save people from homelessness, but from housing stress, because they wanted to pick up renters as a voting block. I remember Adam Bandt visibly seething in rage at having parliamentary rules explained to him, because he is a narcissist who wants everyone to know that he's a good and infallible person because he acts on his principles.

Acting on principles is the easy thing to do, but it's also dereliction of duty as prime minister, because it gets you the job title of "former prime minister". Whitlam and Rudd acted on principle, they lasted one term and were proceeded by a decade of Liberals. We cannot afford another decade of Liberals.

No way America would give up Pine Gap.

I think America is more likely to invade us than China is anyway.

Wasn't she in the news for saying something else insane recently? She is not a good anti-semitism envoy.

You want Albanese to single-handedly abolish global capitalism, against the will of the Australian electorate? I think, as far as capitalism goes, small business is on the less unethical side.

Albanese is an adult, he needs to deliver the best outcomes he can from within the system we're given, not refuse to engage in the hopes that it would somehow fix things.

That phrasing comes from a channel that calls the Teals "not-shit". The imported narrative that "both sides are the same" gives license to the conservative working class to vote against their economic interests, but frankly speaking the Labor party is broadly made up of people who genuinely care but are faced with a corrupt system operating under American global dominance.

We have it quite good in Australia, for the most part. It could be SO much worse.

"A real estate convention in Australia" to be precise.