A frightening amount of reactionaries will unironically believe this

😂😂😂😂😂😂 most coherent anarchist theory

And yet china refuses to make policies that support billionaires and benefit the bourgeoisie class specifically, they instead do the opposite and fuck them over to the point where western media makes articles about how china is fucking over billionaires as if that's a bad thing.

That's what separates MLs from reactionaries and people like maoists who do not understand dialectical materialism and operates on idealism and being dogmatic.

If china really were revisionist they would be stripping social safety nets, reducing funding for public infrastructure, increasing privatization of everything that's currently public and increasing policies favoring the bourgeoisie. Change happens in elliptical motion. For example when the USSR became revisionist they switched over real quick and policies favoring the proletariat were quickly stripped away in favor of pro bourgeoisie ones. The revisionists in powere immediately enriched themselves with this.

Maoists and reactionaries don't look at objective material reality.

Starting off with enemy states of western imperialist nations is probably not going to go well. It's better to start with talking about subjects that directly relate to and affects their material interest.

This is all assuming you are talking to someone who isn't a bourgeoisie or materially well off. You can then talk about how their wages aren't improving, and change in the nation isn't for the better for people like him and how no matter who is elected it seems like they don't change anything for the better. This can then get into discussions about class interests (how the proletariat and bourgeoisie obtain wealth and their conflicting interests) and exactly what determines a "democracy" and how the nations they live in aren't "democracies" as they are dictatorships of the bourgeoisie. Get them to understand what capitalism really is and then describe features of communism without the word communism that they may agree with. Materialism vs idealism can also be discussed here. Debunking propaganda against communism and AES nations is gonna take a long time unless they are open-minded and willingly want to get a new perspective.

I have seen multiple redditors say this but unironically

Yeah and I am one of them and I do not like polymatter's shitty anti china propagandist takes that has a slight positive rice paper wrapping around it. He doesn't lead to better understanding and positive relations to China. For example his shitty Chinese efficiency video is full of misinformation and china bad takes on their hsr and the video is weaponized to attack china in that regard as well as his china collapse videos in the past.

Him throwing a few bones here and there does not make up for his propagandist takes and the fact that people think he is remotely accurate is concerning.

It's like seeing Tucker Carlson going against some western propaganda points and going listen to this guy he's saying some good shit.

I have no idea why you are obsessed with defending this procapitalist shitbag propagandist.

Polymatter is cringe

Jesus Christ doesn't have much durability feats, his body was damaged by medieval tech from normal people, and would probably lose badly in a fight vs an average American police officer, especially because of his skin color which will cause extra aggression from the American cop.

Goku wins 10/10 fights

https://twitter.com/ardenthistorian/status/1665930120962486275?s=20 https://twitter.com/CornelWest/status/23848928873021440

Cornel West is antimarxist, is affiliated with Ron de Santos, and is pro Reagan

Based

Replace the guy on the top left with a child with no dialogue spoken and it would also be pretty accurate

Found the lib