Isn't Copenhagen and other bike friendly cities using bike lanes specifically to not have Bikes and Cars on the same lane? Cars are also great and super flexible, but cities should be designed in a way you can get easily from one to another by car, bus or train without needing to drive through other cities. For smaller cities it would be ideal to get to its outskirts with great and cheap parking places and can change to public transport or smaller things like bike or e-roller or similar. Historical grown cities and driveways have the drawback of having main roads and only connections going through areas they should not. There is a lot more to good traffic planning than not overtaking and reducing speed limits to 30.
Die FDP hat ihren Regierungsauftrag doch vollkommen erfüllt? Kann man sich doch noch gut daran erinnern, das sie von Springerkollegen den Auftrag bekommen haben Rot Grün zu blockieren. Ist ihnen doch perfekt gelungen.
Echt nice, aber ja, voll deutsch!
Betrugs-Verdacht? und was ist mit fahren ohne ticket? gleich in Knast mit Vorstrafe wie der restliche Pöbel! Ach warte ist ja Polizei.
Doch der hilft ... im Verschleppen von Lösungen ;)
Bikes and Cars do not work well together. You will never have car free cities, even in small towns in EU, if you can't drive around it with a faster road. Cities should not be build around important short and fast traffic roads, but that is how they are grown historical. Situation in rural areas is also very different to bigger cities. I would also say 30 is far from great for bikes. Most normal people drive slower and some drive faster. Speed is not the answer. Cars and bikes need different lanes. Everything longer than ~25km to work will be for cars or public transport. A good transition to having better transport will take a long time and reducing speeds to 30 is not a good solution.
hey und jetzt wird es nur ein + von 10 000 € Mei muss der den Gürtel aber enger schnallen. Warum nochmal wird unseren top Politikern nicht mehr geglaubt? Wie wollten die nochmal die Demokratie stärken? Werden sie jetzt 1000x€ an sinnvolle Projekte spenden? ... Ob man vll mit dem Slogan "Wählt mich, ich spare bei unverschämt hohen Politiker Gehälter, wenn wir sparen müssen!" gewählt werden kann?
morroind > oblivion
30 is awful. I like 40 and 60 so much more. 30 might be still better than awful timed red lights.
The red light timings sometimes incentivizes to go faster as with 55-60km/h you can have a green wave and don't need stop at any red light. for that it is totally worth it to drive faster. i hate when red light phase is longer than green phase. there are some really bad decisions on how red light timings work. Most do drive their path to work twice and know the timings and those do know when to drive faster/slower and will drive more aggressive to not wait at that one stupidly timed red light and have to wait and have like 25% more time to commute twice! (20->25min). It's nice to calculate it with statistics but the way to work and back is better known and a slower driver might cause you to need to wait at multiple red lights while you could have driven a bit faster (and not always faster like in my first sentence but driving as fast as is allowed) and did not have to wait at any of that stupid red lights. I'm all for speed limits and better bike lanes etc. but driving slow when it's stupid and stealing others precious time is fucking awful. What i also like are those that drive 60-70 constantly. Fuck man drive 100 if it is allowed and you can and drive 50 in the city but know, slow you down and than don't even drive slower for the safety of entices in the city.
And who is media? The good old follow the money. Sure there is also money on good progressive things, but currently some wealthy invest more into things that help those few wealthy people. Democracy means a majority should decide but this is undermined by money from few very wealthy influencing decisions by a majority, so that you could say decisions are influenced and done by a few wealthy without good intentions for majority of people.
Ich vermute mal, dass die Verschlüsselung keine Lösung ist, da dass Problem hauptsächlich die IP Konflikte sind? Subnetz abändern könnte da eher die Lösung bringen. Verschlüsselung dann nur, damit deine Nachbarn nicht so einfach in dein Netzwerk eindringen können. IP Konflikte können sie dann zwar immer noch auslösen, dann müssten sie aber schon böswillig stören ollen und selber Störungen bei ihnen selbst ebenfalls hinnehmen. Ich denke, dass wird eher nicht der fall sein. Aber interessant, da ich an so einen Fall noch gar nicht gedacht hatte bei D-LAN. Ich komme mit W-LAN ganz gut zurecht und würde ansonsten immer versuchen über richtige LAN-Kabel zu gehen. Bin da altmodisch/konservativ.