[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 10 points 3 hours ago

Its food man. It belongs if you like it, it doesn't if you don't. I don't understand some of these arguments where "the originating culture did it this way so it belongs!" Who cares how people half way across the world make their burritos, fuck culture and tradition. Cooking is art, do what you want and make it how you like. Personally I put rice in because its an easy nutritious filler that doesnt impact taste or texture too bad and which extends the good meats and seasoning and stuff out a couple meals.

[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Thanks for spending time to put these links together seitzer, you're awesome! By chance do you have any personal tips/advice for getting started?

29
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by SmokeyDope@piefed.social to c/mycology@mander.xyz

I got a spore syringe with shrooms of my choice and some uncle bens rice bags a while ago. One guy I watch shows off a super easy method of injecting into the bags and fruiting directly from there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cZe1Og2tro

But then I go on the unclebens reddit and read through shroomscouts guide with dubtubs and putting space heaters with thermostats in a closet and coconut coir mixing with spawn and it starts to make me feel anxious like maybe this isn't for me. I just want some mushrooms man why does this have to be a 20 step process from innoculation to fruiting. And then everyone hypes up contamination like unless you make an air controlled still box its gaurenteed to get contamination, and how the uncle bens ready rice I got is too watery compared to alternatives, and how fruiting from bag is so much less yield than the tub spawning method, and on and on and on. Am I reading too deep into it and should just shove the syringe in and tape over and see what happens? Is it okay if I just go with the first guys method and not worry about the tubs and maintaining water droplets and all that?

28

Some questions for purely educational purposes:

  1. What are some good sites to buy seeds from? Recommended strains?
  2. what are some good guides on the topic? Anything for absolute beginners?
  3. Whats the cost of equipment look like? What is the absolute bare minimum I would need to get started for indoors growing?
[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You are close I think! though its not quite that simple IMO. . According to penrose spacetime diagrams the roles of space and time get reversed in a black hole which causes all sorts of wierdness from an interior perspective. Just like the universe has no center, it also has no single singularity pulling everything in unlike a black hole. The universe contains many singularities, a black hole contains one singularity that might connect to many universes depending on how much you buy into the complete penrose diagrams.

RSgZdrlNP5661Ma.png

71i1aSqo4oJkvaY.png

Now heres where it gets interesting. Our observable universe has a hard limit boundary known as the cosmological horizon due to finite speed of light and finite universe lifespan. Its impossible to ever know whats beyond this horizon boundary. similarly,black hole event horizons share this property of not being able to know about the future state of objects that fall inside. A cosmologist would say they are different phenomenon but from an information-theoretic perspective these are fundamentally indistinguishable Riemann manifolds that share a very unique property.

LZht0PvNgQCH0wg.jpg

They are geometric physically realized instances of uncomputability which is a direct analog of godelian incompleteness and turing undecidability within the universes computational phase space. The universe is a finite computational system with finite state system representation capacity of about 10^122 microstates according to beckenstein bounds and Planck constant. If an area of spacetime exceeds this amount of potential microstates to represent it gets quarantined in a black hole singularity so the whole system doesnt freeze up trying to compute the uncomputable.

The problem is that the universe can't just throw away all that energy and information due to conservation laws, instead it utilizes something called 'holographic principle' to safely conserve information even if it cant compute with it. Information isn't lost when a thing enters a black hole instead it gets encoded into the topological event horizon boundary itself. in a sense the information is 'pulled' into a higher fractal dimension for efficient encoding. Over time the universe slowly works on safely bleeding out all that energy through hawking radiation.

So say you buy into this logic, assume that the cosmological horizon isn't just some observational limit artifact but an actual topological Riemann manifold made of the same 'stuff' sharing properties with an event horizon, like an inverted black hole where the universe is a kind of anti-singularity which distributes matter everywhere dense as it expands instead of concentrating matter into a single point. what could that mean?

So this holographic principle thing is all about how information in high dimensional topological spaces can be projected down into lower dimensional space. This concept is insanely powerful and is at the forefront of advanced computer modeling of high dimensional spaces. For example, neural networks organize information in high dimensional spaces called activation atlases that have billions and trillions of 'feature dimensions' each representing a kind of relation between two unique states of information.

orUFuJRVuuQl0zZ.webp

So, what if our physical universe is a lower dimensional holographic projection of the cosmological horizon manifold? What if the unknowable cosmological horizon bubble surrounding our universe is the universes fundimental substrate in its native high dimensional space and our 3D+1T universe perspective is a projection?

[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
  1. Rotation is meaningless without an external reference frame to compare against. Consider that right now the planet (and your body) is rotating at ~1000km/h but to us it feels stationary. We only know the planet rotates because we observe effects like the sun,moon,stars rotate around us (which ancient peoples misunderstood as earth-centerism thinking everything rotates around us)

  2. Rotation mathematically requires a center axis to rotate around. There is no true center to our observable universe, only subjective perspective reference frames. wherever you are is the center from your perspective. So there is no definitive geometric center axis of our universe to rotate around.

[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 25 points 5 days ago

... I really hoped that this wasn't a thing, but im not surprised in the least.

SY6H1alkDVgAXzw.png

Its just fucking painful, man.

nV1Dk50cInoWiFA.png

352
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by SmokeyDope@piefed.social to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

Never worry about commie crap like public citations getting in the way of misinformation rhetoric again! (Because the LLM trained on fuckin twitter made it up lmao)

On the flipside for an actually cool non-cucked integration of LLMs with wikipedia check out this post on the localllama where the person shares their project of using a local private llm to search through a local kiwix server instance of wikipedia. https://piefed.social/post/1333130

148

A while ago I was having fun theorycrafting seeing if there were potential connections relating knot geometry/ formation to wavefunction field excitation as well as better understanding computational complexity classes of knot formation.

During my research I came across an interesting class of fractal ' wild knots ' that recursively cross into eachother infinitely. The wild knot shown in post displays cantor set class bifurcation.

PLZRVsF5RMnbr6p.png

Heres a 3d animation of a knot known as the ' Alexander Horned Sphere '

6U0Ui6CLYLUFrg1.jpg

z5m6LgUJZvVQ9RX.gif

These knots are pretty cool to look at.

[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 49 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You know something cm0002 just wanted to let you know I appreciate the dichotomy formed between posting these shitpost memes making fun of corporate AI trash one second while simultaneously posting genuinely informative news keeping the localllama community updated the next. It helps keep it real.

I havent used twitter in many years. Do they really let their llms have a twitter account and be taggable like this? I though they would have learned it doesnt worked out so great when microsoft tried it with TayAI years ago.

[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago

As a bonus their mom briefly became socialist when she freely shared some crabs and HIV with you :)

[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Hi, hope you don't mind me giving my two cents.

Local models are at their m9st useful in daily life when they scrape data from a reliable factual database or from the internet and then present/discuss that data to you through natural language conversation.

Think about searching for things on the internet now a days. Every search provider stuffs ads in top results and intentionally ofsucates the links your looking for especially if its a no-no term like pirating torrent sites.

Local llms can act as an advanced generalized RSS reader that automatically fetches articles and sources, send STEM based queries to wolfram alpha llm api and retrieve answers, fetch the weather directly from openweatherAPI, retrieve definitions and meanings from local dictionary, retrieve Wikipedia article pages from a local kiwix server, search ArXiv directly for prior searching. One of Claude's big selling points is the research mode toolcall that scrapes hundreds of sites to collect up to date data on the thing your researching and presenting its finins in a neat structured way with cited sources. It does in minutes what would traditionally take a human hours or days of manual googling.

There are genuine uses for llms if your a nerdy computer homelab type of person familiar databases, data handling and can code up/integrate some basic api pipelines. The main challenge is selling these kinds of functions in an easy to understand and use way for the tech illiterate who already think bad of llms and similar due to generative slop. A positive future for llms integrated into Firefox would be something trained to fetch from your favorite sources and sift out the crap based on your preferences/keywords. More sites would have APIs for direct scraping and the key adding process would be one click button

[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm interested in how many of those dog bites are contributed by pitbulls and rotweilers. I don't like to perpetuate stereotypes but every physically intimidating hyperaggressive dog ive met has been a one of those. People want the safety that comes with those killing machines but they refuse to properly train them and cook up some serious cope when their precious furry son breaks their electric fence and bites the face off a child walking by.

[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 18 points 6 days ago

Inferior rehash version of the OG

[-] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I hate that the basic polygons and their 3d counterparts are all people think of theyre so boring. Fuck Circles/spheres, Fuck squares/cubes, and no, hexagons are not the bestagons. You want to know what natures perfect shape is? Its a tie between the Mandelbrot Set and maybe Pascals Triangle if you consider that a kind of data structure shape. Your shape efficently packs interior space in a minimum surface area? Thats cool, mine encodes the entirety of combinatorics with fractal geometry and acts as an actual map showing the boundaries between order and chaos. Your shape aperiodically tiles the plane? Thats neat, mine geometrically encodes the logistic map which governs things like animal population changes over time.

Imagine a race of star treck aliens flying around in one of these things and tell me it wouldn't be more visually interesting than a big technophile bondage cube.
kXyLIlI58kJacPU.jpg

view more: next ›

SmokeyDope

joined 6 days ago