The response to his paper in the video seems to imply that, at least in the paper, he is more explicit about AI lacking the requirements of consciousness.
Fair enough. I acknowledge that I made a mistake, here.
Yeah, wanted to get the new seasons of Futurama on bluray as a gift, turns out that they only are on streaming. Of course.
It would be a sign of the End Times. Problem is that if it is then they've been Left Behind.
That's the problem.
Maybe I'm just reading the room wrong, but the consensus of the comment section seems to be "haha he thinks AI can replace psychics" but all psychics do is take what people said, reframe it and maybe add some nonsense after that can sound vaguely correct. For the most part, that is LLMs. LLMs could replace the psychic industry because unlike other professions there's zero obligation to be correct about anything.
Is it unethical? Absolutely. But psychics are already frauds so it's not like a legitimate profession is being replaced.
Of course, I could just be misreading the room.
Or it could be a reference to what often is said before the start of a match of a video game (though they probably left out "kick ass" for marketing purposes).
Edit: actually, considering that, maybe there's a reveal at the end that they're in the Basilisk torture sim, so... there might be something there?