Not even, they should be used to interpret/process natural language and maybe generate some filler things (smart defaults etc; a good use is generating titles for things). Translation it's very good at too.

The more text an LLM has to generate, the worse it is, and the less it can base itself off of real text, the less it'll do it correctly.

I think these are probably the main bits they wanted to remove (both Article I section 9):

• The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
• No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
• No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

Pure speculation to be clear, but they removed only the end of section 8, and probably removed section 10 because it would have to be numbered differently. Habeas Corpus has been causing them trouble, they've been stealing money pretty blatantly already, and bill of attainder/ex post facto laws seem convenient to them.

What the fuck? He's not even president yet. They disappeared for like a day total?

Reality needs to stop being so poorly written this is so on the nose

It's bad. The original question is being used as a... standard conversation piece, here (though I've never heard that one IRL, I'm not surprised). Like "How are you", "good, how about you", "good" (which is in reality pretty much just a greeting), the person in the meme is saying "i'm sorry, I don't have an excuse for my behavior" ("sorry I'm crazy").

The expected response is reassurance on the second part ("no you're not" to "I'm crazy"), but the received response is reassurance on the first ("it's okay" to "sorry"). This implies that the other person does believe the first person is crazy, but the first person didn't actually 100% mean the "I'm crazy" bit, so it's an accidental insult that the first person can't actually contest in any way and it hurts more because the other person must believe that for real. Therefore, unpleasant, but keeping it in. Hence the face.

Hope that made some sense!

Ngl that link puts me slightly off. It reads exactly like what people booted for very good reasons say

The following paragraph shows how so-called cancel culture was used weaponising [...]

And in the email, Mozilla talks about him violating their "inclusivity" policy... we also don't know what was reported, only the reasons stated.

Not saying that it wasn't unjust, just that we only have 1 perspective and it's written in a way that raises some red flags.

.... do you just expect everybody who lives there to pack up and leave? Even though their entire lives might be there and moving costs a ton?

But there's no "biological" reason for that. In the same way, skirts/dresses being for women and suits/ties being for men, leg hair, haircuts, voice, mannerisms, emotional availability, all get tied one gender or another.

We, in our society, have associated some properties to one of two genders. Some of these properties tend to be associated to one sex (sex being a more "biological" thing (but still not binary or unchangeable!)), but many of them are just expectations we put upon people. This is what "gender is a social construct" means; that the general understanding and intuition about gender is constructed by the society in which we live. Different societies may have more than 2 genders or completely different sets of associations.

Unfortunately these categorizations are bad for a significant portion of the population, including trans people, gender non-confirming people, but even cishet people; how many times have you heard of some act making you "not a real man" (eg crying for a movie)?

That's Grant Anthony O'Brien. Look him up, watch True Facts about Grant Anthony O'Brien it's great.

Anyway no idea if this is him or a character.

I will manifest within your abode to install a GNU/Linux distro on your computer

As a preventative measure, I have now installed Linux on all my computers

"15 minute drive" at rush hour. My man could walk.

This entire comment could be summarized by "butbutbut people who live in areas with shitty public transport have to drive"

We already know this. The point is to make it better, because good public transport is better for literally everyone. I live on the edge of town, and I'm 5 minutes from 7 bus stops for 5 different bus lines, and a train station. Most of those buses come every 10-15 minutes, and are up to 5 minutes late at rush hour. It is by far a better experience to take the bus than to drive for me.

You posted to it lmao, by @ ing linux@lemmy.ml. Fediverse!

I'm totally cool with polyamory and its variants, but this infographic definitely paints monoamory as a lesser choice which is cringe (it also says "idealized monoamory" instead of just monoamory which I don't get).

Don't judge other's choices, doesn't matter if their choice is polyamory or monoamory.