Yeah but then I can't tell what filetypes they are. Having the type directly in the name is an awesome convention. And theoretically, it prevents the os from having to read every file's contents. And it's good for not having to use thumbnails. So you can have more condensed file browsing. It's also better for proprietary filetypes and new things since the os doesn't need to know wtf something is.

Your logic reminds me of using nondescript variable names in programming. Yes, the system will probably know, but I'm the user, I'm the person this is all for. And it's good convention to have good naming convention. File extensions are nice to have and good convention.

It looks like these things are all over the board, going from useless and detrimental, to actually good, most of them contextual.

It's like rfkj got brain damage and then tried to make sense if it. It's like he almost gets it but then veers off to the side.

I was actually just talking to a person about this. How it's pretty easy to pursue truth of a topic and continue down the wrong road, all just from a wrong premise or even a missing fact that gives you the wrong perspective and direction. Continuing to deepen an "understanding" of something, stubbornly. Add cognitive biases to a deep impairment, and now you're ready to run the United States apparently.

What doesn't kill him only makes him dumber and more dangerous

I don't know what those two letters mean. I wish they had written out the name. I've avoided buying Adobe stuff because it's stupidly expensive, but I'm still aware that in some industries, some of these have been industry standards at one point or another. Being able to tell wtf their names are, or even what they do would be helpful.

It's so forced that we're kind've getting used to it. Tell people that think it's gender neutral to "have sex with dudes" and see how they react.

It's always just been about stubbornness and the unwillingness to change, despite being extremely contextual, at best. Force the overall culture before changing a shitty perspective of seeing your trans friend as masculine person that fits into your group of guys. It's really toxic, selfish, and manipulative imo. And because boys are hot and I'm dumb and weak, I excuse it sometimes, but I really shouldn't, we should all know better.

I'm okay with less propaganda. But also that then raises the question: what is Trump's actual goal, then?

Intersex people are often trans. Because they were assigned a gender at birth, and many decide against that decision in various ways.

When is ignorance an acceptable excuse?

Yes... But also no. It's important to address the cancer, even when you think it probably won't take root.

The point of what? Life? Humanity? Existing? Existence?

I get the anti-anti-sexuality, but doesn't this boil life down to.... Not even procreation, but ... Sex?

What about asexual people? What about... Wonderful moments or beautiful things or cake or socializing beyond sex? What about WORDS and complex thought and ideas and puns and coffee and art and adrenaline and naps and music?

I can't say I entirely disagree with you, but I also don't agree, primarily because I'm not sure exactly what the hill you're dying on is. Can you elaborate a bit to help me/us understand exactly what you're trying to say?

Imagine a world where all hamburgers are custom and properly made.

I want a burger now.

Dementia here we come