2
Stop this nihilist BS and vote like it’s your last chance.
It was a perfect success from the perspective of the people who instigated it in the 1980’s
What millions of dollars of speech can buy
For a few million dollars of speech and some fancy hunting trips, but only if own the jet outright, you can get anything changed.
Did anyone read the privacy settings? I thought Europe had rules against spying and making it impossible to opt out.
If they federate, we can scrape their data and view it without ads and redistribute it where they cannot track it.
Basically, none of the B-List celebrities are never going to give up their followings on Twitter.
If the A-List comes over to the Fediverse, we could become a thing as a Twitter replacement. But short of a national stampede, they aren’t coming unless ALL of the sheeple go first.
I think you mean a Big Bag “O” Chips
The quality of the obscure subs is dropping. Ironically, this is actually what is valuable to the LLMs.
The front page is mostly twitter and TikTok anyway.
Don’t feed the trolls. Downvote and move on.
I don’t think he is anywhere near a chilling effect on the liberal justices.
They main problem we have with SCOTUS is that they don’t have to GAF what anybody says.
That is good if the person has principles, but has problems if they are grifting trash.
The thing he should be complaining about is the bribes - I’m sorry, speech - that the justices are taking. But since he gets 8 figures of speech by consulting gigs for his wife, there is no chance the Chief Grifter will tackle the real problem.
view more: next ›
RestrictedAccount
joined 1 year ago
Just to clarify, In regards to:
No one should be allowed to weaponize government