[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I did not define the word magic. Society did that. My choice is to communicate effectively, which means largely respecting the established consensus on which words mean what. If you'd rather render yourself ineffectual by using your own personal alternate definitions for established words, that is your choice, but it's not a choice that aligns with my or most other people's priorities.

Besides, "magic" only has whimsy associated with it because we restrict it to fake things. If we'd been calling electricity "magic" all along, "magic" would be mundane and you'd be over here complaining that we don't use a more whimsical term like "etherics" or "thaumaturgy" or "electricity."

As for wonder... what the flippity floppity fuck are you even talking about? The scientific world is full of wonder. Wonder is what drives science in the first place, and it has nothing at all to do with terminology. If you look up at the night sky and are too distracted by vocabulary to feel wonder at the pretty lights shining across unfathomable temporal and spatial distances, well, that seems more like a deficiency in you than any sort of flaw in which arbitrary sounds and squiggles we've picked out to describe things with.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I heard both growing up. To me they were just synonyms for the same game. Well, almost the same. Duck Duck Gray Duck is a little more fun because you assign colors to all of the ducks, so you have to pay a little more attention. But when not actually playing the game, the two versions live in the same pigeon hole within my brain.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

True. However, thanks to the magic of virtual machines you can run multiple instances of arch on each device! Just be careful you don't run too many overlapping arches or they'll transform into domelinux and the HOA will fine you for architectural mismatch.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 36 points 11 months ago

No. Thinking about the panda is involuntary in that scenario. Typing up and submitting an explicitly unwanted response is not involuntary. It's a thing a person chooses to do expressly against the wishes of the person making the request.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 17 points 11 months ago

Don't ease into it at all. Wait for a moment where it would be funny, then go whole hog with it. Treat it like a joke... but then just keep going. Never go back. Don't even acknowledge there is a back. Pretend this is how you've always talked and they're insane if they think otherwise.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 44 points 11 months ago

The article's title presents this in a misleading way. The bill in question wouldn't prevent people from using their preferred names and pronouns. What it would do is prohibit the government from spending federal funds to implement or enforce any rules or recommendations encouraging its employees and contractors to respect those names and pronouns.

So in other words this is an attempt at protecting hate-speech, not at restricting free-speech. Shitty, but probably not unconstitutional.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

Twas a tubular time.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Plus it's not just about total time between "I want food" and "Nom nom". There's also the matter of how usable that time is. On a good day it might only take me a few minutes longer to get fast food, but all of that time is spent behind the wheel and most of it is spent driving. Making a sandwich at home, on the other hand, only about a minute is spent actively handling food. The other seventeen minutes while the patty cooks are free; I can it spend doing anything I please. So instead of comparing twenty minutes for fast food vs. eighteen minutes for DIY, it's really more like twenty minutes vs. one minute.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

It's a fun show. The ending didn't quite land right, but whatever; it's not the kind of series where that matters. Also, I didn't have any problem with the CGI and don't understand why so many people are complaining about it; probably they're just the CGI equivalent of audiophiles and should be ignored by any who don't share that particular affliction.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Are you playing the stable build? I don't remember if it was like this on 0.F and I haven't tried experimental yet, but on 0.G the crafting list is sorted with craftable recipes at the top in white and the ones with missing requirements at the bottom in grey.

That's assuming you're talking about the actual crafting menu (& key). If you're instead talking about the construction menu (* key), it doesn't sort but you can hide the unavailable options with the ; key.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I’m one of the few here who seem to understand how people actually communicate in the real world

Nah. People in the real world don't use the noun phrase "a female" when referring respectfully to women. They say woman, lady, girl, gal, or something along those lines. The only times a woman is called "a female" are in technical contexts or when the speaker is a misogynist.

[-] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I recommend CrossCode. It's a puzzle-heavy top-down action-RPG. Think 2D Zelda games, but faster paced and sci-fi themed. You play as Lea, an amnesiac who's trying to recover her memories by playing a fictional MMO called CrossWorlds. I love basically everything about it: the art, the music, the characters, the story, the puzzles, the level design; it's just great.

view more: next ›

Pizzasgood

joined 1 year ago