From https://x.com/liamcunningham1/status/1946575903238095166
There's a need for at least 700 trucks every day to cover everyone's needs(, at least 1000-1500 according to wikipedia), three months ago the WaPo talked about only allowing sixty trucks per day, citing israeli officials.
Since the last ceasefire there's apparently less than a hundred trucks per day(, 27/day for the WFP, sometimes with a week-long pause on truck movements). The WFP claims to possess more than 116,000 tons of food assistance, enough to feed 1 million people for up to 4 months.
The GHF only fed 2% of the population. The same wiki article says it now delivers 2.6M meals/day of 500-700kcal, enough to feed 800.000 people, others only speak of 1.2M meals, confirmed here and in most articles. Note that they proudly claim transparency, but that's the most official page i could find launched the 11th of June and last updated the 12th. They weirdly did not even bother to create a website(, why ?), and are critized for their behavior(, here as well,) and opacity, apparently linked with Boston Consulting Group who was «shocked and outraged to learn that people at the firm were so closely tied to it», and fired two people linked to the project.
The UNRWA is mostly inactive now, the OCHA doesn't distribute food, nor does the UNICEF/WHO/..
The World Central Kitchen has suspended its programs in April after Israel killed 7 of its workers, and only partially relaunched their program.
The help from some border states, like Jordan or Egypt, doesn't amount to that much a.f.a.i.k.(, perhaps 50 trucks per day for Jordan, while Egypt is blocking the aid).
Their goal is to get rid of the local population, either though murders or by forcing them to flee, while systematically destroying their habitation like during the Nakba.
In April 2025, Israel Katz, Israel's Defense Minister, said that « Israel's policy is clear : no humanitarian aid will enter Gaza, and blocking this aid is one of the main pressure levers preventing Hamas from using it as a tool with the population. »
Edit/Addition : Another worrying thing is that COGAT, a unit from Israel's ministry of defense, stopped updating its weekly reports, 150 trucks for 2M people has always been far below the minimum of 700 required, and that weren't given for some weird reasons somehow linked to Hamas.
I couldn't find an official statement from COGAT explaining why they stopped, but it should logically be somewhere. Doesn't help in trusting Israel's intentions.
We still have the UN weekly reports, the chapter "Deteriorating Food Insecurity and Malnutrition" in their most recent one seems worth reading.
ramblings
I've already mentioned in previous posts that we(sterners) should give territories, or that there could be an international governance to force israeli and palestinian coexistence on these lands, and that there are other solutions than "let the strongest remain".
It goes beyond Israel : there'd be no reason for a struggle towards hegemony if we aimed to live united in diversity, never possibly threatened again by our "opponent"'s rise.
Such world system cannot be established if you're not at the top of the world, and whoever reached the top never wanted anything else than hegemony/'the destruction of whichever diversity it doesn't like', not caring that protecting (the 'diversity of'/'path chosen by' )others would also protect us
at the same rate 
despite socialism never working(, both sides were helped, but one of them was under sanctions and without any neocolonial help, a higher military burden, etc.)
From https://x.com/BenjaminNorton/status/1948865864935047607, it's everyday :
« The spring, which feeds the pumping station, is the main or backup water source for some 110,000 people, according to the Palestinian company that manages it – making it one of the most vital in the West Bank, where water is in chronic short supply. » (source
« He said two other springs in the area had also recently been taken over. (...)
“We have no options; digging a well is not allowed,” despite the presence of local water springs, he said, pointing to a well project that the UN and World Bank rejected due to Israeli law prohibiting drilling in the area.
The lands chosen for drilling sit in the West Bank’s Area C, which covers more than 60 percent of the territory and is under full Israeli control. (...)
Whereas nearly all residents of Israel and Israeli settlements have running water every day, only 36 percent of West Bank Palestinians do, the report said.»
It's not about filling a private pool, but about depriving palestinians of water, obviously. And there has been no investigation from the israeli police.
And tomorrow it'll be something else, at least internet laws haven't made these informations illegal(, yet).
note on these internet laws
I thought in the past that profiling citizens could already be done through IP adresses, and that it was enough ; however because of VPNs or Tor, these new laws want to go further by not allowing any circumvention.
Besides profiling citizens according to their opinions, there's also the very valid threat of automatic sanctions(, see the law Avia in France, which enforced a ban on terrorist apologia in 1 hour, and hate speech in 24 hours, under the threat of huge sanctions, up to 4% of the social media's worldwide turnover, it was fortunately partially censored in the end, but they still don't see a problem with it, it was followed by a law on global security, the introduction of FranceConnect, and soon the same law than in the UK against anonymity online, in the name of protecting poor little children from pornography).
Italy also aims to put an end to online anonymity in order to fight "hate speech"(, it'll still be mandatory to hate your enemies), or misinformation(, we banned Red and African Stream, along with every russian media, misinformation is whatever isn't allowed by our officials).
The EU has the Digital Service Act, and the eIDAS 2.0 is coming, as well as perhaps Chat Control, which France's attack on Pavel Durov give no doubt about their goal to end privacy(, including on Signal, ProtonMail, ...), and we know that the next step will be an automatic sanction for illegal speeches.
These sanctions were already in place for whomever is considered a terrorist(, e.g. it felt natural not to have any knowledge of Hamas' point of view/narrative, nothing new since it's always the same lies, ugly biases, atrocity propaganda, ...). We(sterners), or at least we{french}, did not have much problems in censoring(, dis-informing,) "terrorist" or russian medias. So my guess is that the next step aims at targeting domestic medias, but what do i know, i can only see that the current censorship legislation/powers still aren't enough for them, and that accusations of misinformation or hate speech have been abused, and will continue to be so.
I.d.k., is Georges Ibrahim Abdallah right ?
pointless remarks
Even if Hamas implicitly recognized Israel in the Art.20 of its 2017 charter, its speeches, along with the lines of Iran and other antizionist states, seem to imply that they wouldn't be satisfied with a two-states solution.
I disagree with that stance, mainly because Israel isn't left with any other choice than destroying them, since even sharing the land wouldn't be enough.
I'd advise going back to the position of 1988-1993 when the palestinians were the peaceful ones, admitting their unilateral defeat, and recognizing Israel, who, a.f.a.i.k., greedily wanted the rest of Palestine instead of making peace.
But i'd also advise to never cease asking for a compensation for the lost territories, a compensation which has to come from western countries since israelis don't have anything to offer. Which would mean that the arabs(, and other muslim-majority countries,) would refuse to have any commerce with the west as long as they're not compensated for what's objectively one of the most important loss of their history. It has to be through an alliance with the means to exert pressure and the will to stay cohesive, even if it'll take them centuries to obtain a just retribution.
Also, if they recognize Israel, they'll have to absorb the israelis into their culture, so that they become middle-easterners and not westerners anymore, it's not hard to envision a day when friendship among them and their neighbours will feel natural.
But my point is that countries&movements that ask for a disparition of Israel will naturally be hunted down by israelis. And yes, Israel doesn't want a two-states solution and they couldn't give a damn about the ninth commandment(, or the sixth one and many others for that matter). As long as they don't show their change of mind, e.g. by removing their illegal colonies and retreating to the 1967 borders(, or the 1948 ones), then i'll continue to point them as the main responsible for this situation, just that i can't pretend that they're the only ones opposed to a two-states solution, even if they're the main problem, that's all.
The second Intifada and Hamas wouldn't have appeared if Israel respected the Oslo I and II agreements that it signed(, and every survey show that palestinians were much more supportive of them than israelis, videos show a radiant Yasser Arafat, he publicly praised again the Geneva Initiative in 2003 and authorized Abed Raddo to sign it, while Ariel Sharon categorically opposed it as well as the Oslo agreements).
It's Netanyahu who freezed the process in 1996 : the first step of the agreements were respected by Yitzhak Rabin(, withdrawal from Gaza and Jericho in 1994, palestinian elections in 1996, and then israelis had 18 months to withdraw from the zone C towards the zones B and A), and even american negotiators like Dennis Ross said that the "further redeployments" in Annex I, Article I, Appendix 1, was understood as a total withdrawal, not Netanyahu's 2%, who continued to increase the number of settlements in the West Bank, claiming a lack of security but i'm not the only one who thinks that what they're really interested in is an excuse to have more lands.
Netanyahu only won with 50.4% in 1996, the present would have been different.
The Palestinian's refusal of the two-states solution is a consequence of Israel's refusal, not the cause.