[-] Pacrat173@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There’s a God Mastodon account which is pretty good I’ll see if I can find it

Found it Here’s the link

5

This is one I’ve wondered about for a while. Common ways the Abrahamic God (I'm focusing on Christianity‘s interpretation of god but if anyone has examples from other religions please let me know) is described are. The father, a Shepard. There are also some instances which while not directly referring to God use female analogies.

Examples
To our God and Father be glory for ever and ever. Amen. Philippians 4:20

Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? Matthew 6:26

“Can a mother forget the baby at her breast and have no compassion on the child she has borne? Though she may forget, I will not forget you!

Isaiah 49:15

For he is our God; and we are the people of his pasture, and the sheep of his hand. To day if ye will hear his voice Psalm 95:6

Wikipedia has a good article about the topic for those interested. I lean more towards the “divine gender” as the article puts it or as God being a being which doesn’t have the human concept of gender. What does the community think about the topic?

11

I learned about the Friend through This video I believe it was a really good deep dive and respectful to the friend who not only experienced hate for the the Friend‘s gender identify at the time but later historians attempts to discredit the Friend‘s identity. Also Public Universal Friend wished “referred only to "the Public Universal Friend" or short forms such as "the Friend" or "P.U.F.", and many avoided gender-specific pronouns even in private diaries” so I'm using these terms instead of they.

20

I saw this article on Mastodon and thought the community would like to read it as well

[-] Pacrat173@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I mean like the symbol cross not the ones used for Crucifixion

11
submitted 4 days ago by Pacrat173@lemmy.world to c/scp@lemmy.world

If you’d like to skip my rant and read the full list click Here

We all know Safe, Euclid, and Keter. A lot of us even know the lesser known Thaumiel, and Apollyon. Now for the ones that are a lot less known

Archon which are “anomalies that could theoretically be contained but are best left uncontained for some reason”

we also have Ticonderoga “SCPs cannot be contained, but also do not need to be contained.”

The last ones I will cover are Non-Standard Object Classes

Explained this one is pretty self explanatory “anomalies that are completely and fully understood, to the point where their effects are now explainable by mainstream science, or phenomena that have been debunked or falsely mistaken as an anomaly.” there’s a special page for these and these are some of my favorite non Non-Standard Object Classes

Neutralized “SCPs are former anomalies that are no longer anomalous, either through having been intentionally or accidentally destroyed or disabled.” A good mix in this one a really notable heart breaking one Here be dragons

Decommissioned “SCPs are anomalies that have been intentionally destroyed or stripped of their anomalous properties by the SCP Foundation.”

Pending “SCP articles that have not yet been assigned an object class may be labelled as Pending. This is used to indicate that the Foundation does not currently have enough information to assign an object class to the anomaly.”

Uncontained “SCPs that are not yet contained may be assigned an object class, often Keter”

And finally Esoteric Object Classes

Additional Object classes not listed above are generally created to further the narrative in a particular SCP and only used once, and so are referred to as Esoteric or Narrative Object Classes.

So here’s all of them listed. What’s your favorite article or SCP that is a lesser known class

4
Cross variations (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Pacrat173@lemmy.world to c/open_christian@lemmy.ca

During my research about Christianity I’ve discovered there is a lot more cross variations than I knew about. What’s some of your favorite ones?

Edit

NOT THE ONES USED FOR Crucifixion I mean the cross used as symbols forgot to say that part sorry!

36
submitted 1 week ago by Pacrat173@lemmy.world to c/scp@lemmy.world
9

It’s amazing to see this community grow as quickly as it has!

3

A bit of surprise to see Simple History tackling a alternate history topic but I’m interested to see where they’ll take it

6
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Pacrat173@lemmy.world to c/open_christian@lemmy.ca

Romans 8:38

For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come...

6

Hey y’all I watched this video a while ago and it got me wondering about any other interesting Christian relics let me know of any you find interesting

8
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Pacrat173@lemmy.world to c/genealogy@lemmy.world

Hello all

I’m back at trying to get details on my 3rd great grandmother Jane I’ve made some good progress and have put together a not happy but seemingly correct timeline.

It appears she was in a relationship of some kind not married or at least I can’t find a record of it with my Great grandfather Wilson from sometime around 1891 through 1892. I can confirm through records she had 2 children with him in this time. Robert my second great grandfather in October 1891 and Polly my second great grandaunt in May 1893. he had children with another woman Cordelia. A set of twins were conceived around October 1892 and born in July 1893. The other women he went on to marry in September 1892 and have many children with.

Assuming my dates are right. Polly was conceived sometime around August 1892 and born July 1893. The twins were conceived sometime in October 1892. born in July of 1893.

From what I can tell is they were in a relationship from 1891-1892 and broke apart shortly after Polly was conceived and married Cordelia in September of 1892. I’m aware marriage was traditions were very different in the 1800s than now but assuming I’m correct he had 1 child and another on the way with Jane. Then left her and then married Cordelia about a month after this.

If none of this makes sense and I’m all over the place it’s 2:30 and I’ve been at this for 2 hours so my brain is a bit scrambled. Let me know if this makes any sorta sense, any mistakes I made, or any theories you may have to help me out.

Oh yea turns out the other Jane who had no data on her like this one on the other part of my tree is actually just my 2nd great grandaunt by marriage and not the same one I’ve been researching because that would be too easy.

Thanks for reading my ranting and maybe one day I’ll finally solve this

4
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Pacrat173@lemmy.world to c/open_christian@lemmy.ca

open_christian@lemmy.ca resources list 

LGBTQ+ resources 

https://www.thetrevorproject.org/

https://truecolorsunited.org/

https://glaad.org/resourcelist/

https://www.queerliberationlibrary.org/

LGBTQ+ friendly churches 

https://www.gaychurch.org/find_a_church/

https://www.inclusive-church.org/church-directory/

Find a Church | Is Your Church Clear?

LGBTQ+ positive religious resources 

https://www.lgbtchristianresources.com/

https://lgbtqfamilyacceptance.org/faith-based-resources/

https://www.queertheology.com/

Faith resources

https://www.biblegateway.com/

https://patriciaadderley.com/20-best-christian-websites-to-grow-in-faith/

Christian Resources - Christian.net

Proverbs 31 Ministries

General resources  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suicide_crisis_lines?wprov=sfti1#Crisis_lines_by_country mega list 

US: https://humantraffickinghotline.org/en/report-trafficking

US: https://www.feedingamerica.org/find-your-local-foodbank

US: 988 US suicide hotline

The last 3 are US specific if you would like please comment your local version of needed programs or websites. I have attempted to vet the resources and websites provided If you are aware with any problems with any of these let me know as well thank you and have a wonderful day!

[-] Pacrat173@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

First I heard about SCPs I was probably too young to be reading them. The first I saw was a fake security footage video of 173. My young brain concluded this has to be real it’s right there. I then went to the site clicked on 001 and was afraid I was gonna die fun times

[-] Pacrat173@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Oh don’t worry the staff will be there soon enough

[-] Pacrat173@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

To be fair when I asked a few people said they’d like to be D-Class which is… uh a bit worrying I’d say

[-] Pacrat173@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

It’s gonna take way more than a wall to stop ol Larry his containment procedures are a mile long and even then-

[-] Pacrat173@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I like it think every other SCP is still at the site and the person renting 173’s cell is just oblivious

[-] Pacrat173@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s one of the foundation’s shell companies(or fronts) the most well hidden one could say.

[-] Pacrat173@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Don’t forget the locked box test it explains the classes pretty good

From the wiki

“The Locked Box Test is an informal guideline used to determine an object's most appropriate Object Class. It goes like this:

  • If you lock it in a box, leave it alone, and nothing bad will happen, then it's probably Safe.
  • If you lock it in a box, leave it alone, and you're not entirely sure what will happen, then it's probably Euclid.
  • If you lock it in a box, leave it alone, and it easily escapes, then it's probably Keter.
  • If it is the box, then it's probably Thaumiel.

Extending the analogy to other Object Classes:

  • If it used to need a box, but no longer does, it's Neutralized. If this is because of a deliberate decision by the Foundation, it was probably Decomissioned.
  • If it turns out it never needed a box in the first place, it's probably Explained.
  • If you can't fit it in a box and it's about to end the world, then it's probably Apollyon.
  • If you could have locked it in a box but chose not to, then it's probably Archon.
  • If you can't fit it in a box but that's not a big deal, then it's probably Ticonderoga.
  • If you're not sure what box to put it in yet, it's probably Pending.”
view more: next ›

Pacrat173

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF