[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’d have to change the specification there. That is possible but it will take some time.

Then they should do so, these issues need to be fixed ASAP.

Still you’d need a way to make votes not bound to a user and still hard to spoof.

Obfuscating user IDs via a hash or something would seem like the way to make it work. I'm not a professional programmer, I only know a little bit of python, so I have no idea if I'm talking nonsense on that front. And whilst still not an ideal solution, but sharing non-private votes with your own instance admin and have them share only the total vote count with other instances is another solution. That way you need only trust your instance admin, which is choosable and can also be yourself.

That is what it means. If you have one then go ahead.

Putting the onus on me is a shitty thing to do. I'm not the one running this site in any capacity, but this is an issue that many users are unhappy with. If the issue with the site won't or even can't be fixed, then I will simply not use the site. I don't know how many people feel the same on that front, but I'd imagine there's quite a few.

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed, I am incredibly confused by what seems to be the majority reaction to this.

I've never been particularly involved with the FOSS community, though I do use a few FOSS apps and generally appreciate their view on what FOSS means. I also strongly appreciate data privacy, and it was my observation that the FOSS community was (generally) relatively the same way. So to see this reaction is very surprising. It's quite literally the same terrible argument of "Why fear it if you have nothing to hide" used against multiple data privacy concerns throughout the years.

I think the worst are the bad faith "But Reddit...!" arguments. For one, we're not on Reddit anymore, this is about Lemmy's issues that can be corrected. And for two, whilst Reddit potentially outsourcing that data to the highest bidder is far from ideal, at the very least the data wasn't outright PUBLIC to anyone who wishes to set up a simple server.

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, because the practical option is to be constantly switching accounts and instances based on what you want to look at for 5 minutes each.

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree with what you're saying, but that's not the point of this post. This post is about the fact that an individual user's vote history is semi-public.

i.e. if you were to upvote my comment, anyone who owns an instance would be able to see it was you who upvoted it. Likewise for if you downvote it.

Whilst I'm sure there are those who don't care, I'd personally rather not have any rando who can be bothered to set up a Lemmy instance know what I've voted on. I'd honestly rather just not vote.

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There was a patent filed back in the Wii U days (September 2015) which also described a scroll wheel trigger. Looking back at it now, it seems very Switch-like, though people back then probably would have assumed it was a Wii U Gamepad 2. Maybe it was an old prototype for the Switch that they've converted into a Switch 2?

Here's the patent, and here's the linked PDF with some images.

13
submitted 1 year ago by OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world to c/anime@lemmy.ml

No post for this, thought I’d create one.

AniList | MAL

21
submitted 1 year ago by OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world to c/anime@lemmy.ml

No post for this, thought I'd create one.

Note: Episode 1 is ~48 minutes long.

AniList | MAL

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

do the rules apply to the instance where you have your account, or to the instance where you’re posting/commenting?

That is essentially what I was asking. It kind of seems like it's both, but I'm no fediverse expert.

I guess it really just depends how much of a stickler the lemmy.world mods are, and/or if they have any way of finding out I'm linking to stuff like that.

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not sure where to ask this, so I'll ask here. Linking to pirate sites (not content) is okay here as I understand it. However my account is with Lemmy.world, which in its "rules" specifically states "Protect our community from harassment, malicious or illegal content". Would I technically be at the whim of Lemmy.world by linking to pirate sites, or do I have some leeway here?

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I also think there's an element of time spent with Reddit. For some of us who've been with the site for over a decade, this is the last straw with Reddit. For many others, its their first incident.

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

My Reddit Cakeday used to be nothing special. It's June 30th. There's a certain irony behind all this somewhere.

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It's what I dislike the most about the fediverse concept. It's nice in principle, but it's all far too fragmented, which not only makes it a lot easier to target specific servers, it also introduces the concern that is defederation.

The open source part is great, but the federation part will take a long time yet to convince me, if it ever does.

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Not that guy, but last year they got acquired by Branch, an analytics company. Android Police article about it here. The same company also acquired Sesame of Sesame Universal Search.

To clarify, I'm unaware if they've done anything suspicious since the acquistion, but potentially giving an analytics company launcher level access raised eyebrows for more than a few people, myself included.

[-] OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Possibly an unpopular opinion, but I don't think Lemmy should be viewed as "spite sites". If the entire focus of the community here is to point and laugh at Reddit's failures, rather than actually provide an adequate site's worth of unique content, people will quickly get tired of it and leave.

Of course, it's the hot topic at the moment so it's understandable, but I hope we'll move away from it at some point.

view more: next ›

OmniGlitcher

joined 1 year ago