I don't keep ongoing pay subscriptions to streaming services. Not a judgment of those who do; just my personal preference. I've done one month of Disney+ at a deep discount (to see season one of The Mandalorian) and two months of Paramount+, both times in the past. With Lower Decks' upcoming 4th season and SNW's "Those Old Scientists," I've been thinking about subbing to Paramount+ again. However, with the WGA/SAG-AFTRA strike, I've been wondering if not subscribing to Paramount+ would be in support of the strike.
From what I've found, the WGA and SAG-AFTRA are not currently calling for not subscribing to, or cancelling subscriptions to, streaming services.
Actor John Carroll Lynch on Twitter on July 18, 2023, quote of part of his video (he had previously called for cancelling streaming service subs):
https://twitter.com/MrJCLynch/status/1681324518806278144?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
"I still think it's a good idea, but I've been informed by the union that they do not require that and they don't want that. I don't know why — something to do with the negotiations that I don't agree with, but I do follow the union recommendations, because that's what this is all about."
On Tumblr, author Neil Gaiman replied to a question about cancelling streaming service subscriptions to support the strike. July 12, 2023:
"The WGA has not called for anyone to boycott any of the streamers or to stop their streaming services yet. It's not "crossing the picket line" to watch something on a network that we are striking against. ("Crossing a picket line" is a very real, specific thing with a real meaning.)
I've seen it being discussed, but until the WGA calls for it, I don't suggest doing it."
https://www.tumblr.com/neil-gaiman/722696522150641664/hi-mr-gaiman-i-always-thought-if-i-were-to?source=share
Mr. Gaiman's Tumblr response also has a link to a June, 2023 L. A. Times column, "Column: Is it time to boycott Netflix? How streaming consumers could shape the strike" which I'm posting here because sometimes links to online pages are ephemeral.
So, okay Paramount+. You'll soon be getting some quatloos from me.
I enjoy the exploration of Ferengi society under Grand Nagus Rom, and visiting some of Ferenginar's hot spots. I also enjoy seeing Rom and Leeta again. I love the subversion of Rom's doofiness, and how well Leeta adapted to Ferengi society. First Clerk, indeed. Freeman's frustration was my frustration, but it had a satisfying ending.
I didn't enjoy the lower deck gang's shenanigans as much. There were fun moments, but it felt like a drag on the characters. Mariner's fighting just to be fighting. She has grown a lot over the past seasons. Her undefined angry outburst in this episode seemed pointless. There's nothing keeping JG Lieutenant Mariner from her Ensign Mariner renegade behavior and schemes. Boimler has completely backslid into the previously uncertain, twitchy, insecure Boimler. There's no sign of "Crisis Point 2: Paradoxus'" (s3e8) "I want to be a captain" Tendi.
Rutherford and Tendi's discomfort pretending to be a couple made me uncomfortable. They've clearly been sweet on each other for a while. I could have done without forcing them into this pretend couple scenario, and let their relationship develop at its previous pace. I think Mariner and Boimler being the pretend couple had the potential to be hilarious. And, what the heck. No T'Lyn? Much disappointment.
I think Ransom is the standout in this episode.
The destroyed (maybe? maybe not?) ship of the week is a Ferenghi one. There was the tiniest hint, that one of the crew had been in contact with who or whatever is on that flying ship of destruction. With only 4 episodes left, I hope that ship has a huge payoff after being teased for so long.
I still love Lower Decks. This episode is a mixed bag for me.