It's right on the courts' info page
Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices.
Couldn't help looking it up - so satisfied that it's called a lounge of lizards
Sir, this is a Wendy's
Tbf , we are trying to recreate certain elements of that platform in the fediverse and such a take would be needlessly nuanced
"Stop the corporations" or "save the API" just isn't as effective as saying f the guy who decided to change things
I came here to talk about methyl groups and no one gives them a mention :(
Only if you have a valid excuse - like being drunk apparently
Isn't this doomed to fail in light of the SC's guidance in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v Taamneh ??
Edit: "The platforms’ failure to remove such content, Justice Thomas wrote, was not enough to establish liability for aiding and abetting, which he said required plausible allegations that they 'gave such knowing and substantial assistance to ISIS that they culpably participated in the Reina attack.'” (copied from a NYT article)
What's the reasonableness standard? (to me that's just a standard of review in appeal courts)
Remember to leave a review on the official reddit app regarding it's porno abilities - if there's anything google/iOS app stores love more than anything it's an abundance of apps dedicated to viewing porn
It absolutely is worse for users because we can only find the content via channels that spez approves of - removing the content just means you can find the content to be unavailable faster than if you had to scroll through the ads
I may be misinformed - but I was led to believe this is a book shop and therefore unlikely to lose many customers
Indeed, I posted this on another thread about the court