No, a traffic stop or an interaction with a police officer isn't a detention
Literally just wrong. Detention includes a temporary hold . A traffic stop is a temporary hold. You're just comically wrong. I won't bother replying to the rest because you started your reply with such stupidity.
10,000 people detained out of how many tourists worldwide going to china? Like, I'm just trying to get some context because (1) a massive amount of people visit China every year and (2) how does this compare to other countries. A person being "detained" could literally just be a traffic stop or any other interaction with a police officer.
I guess my point is the article is purposely vague. How would this compare per tourist to the US for example?
Also, what you're mentioning is not at all what I mentioned originally. Which was about the article and Taiwan. You changed the subject to worldwide in order to make the number larger. Which, obviously it would be.
Edit: Asking about actual per capita comparison between countries is bad apparently. I guess "China bad" is heavier than getting actual data. Something this article completely fails to provide.
Yes. It absolutely is. If only there wasn't a video of this dude doing a salute back to back
On top of that "the future of civilization" is a dog whistle to the 14 words of the Nazis
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children
Tell me. What is the difference between the swastika or the salute? I'm gonna guess the main difference is you haven't read 100 reply guys trying to come up with any reason to deny he's a Nazi. Do you know who does that? Nazis. Nazis know that it's still not expectable to be a Nazi. So they will always try to get you to "not believe your lying eyes". While always doing dog whistles to signal to other Nazis. But this salute wasn't a dog whistle. It was a fucking mega phone.
It's amazing a dude can do back to back Nazi salutes and people on the Internet will still defend it because "he said something afterwards that lets me deny what I saw with my lying eyes"
What's next? The dude goes around waving a Nazi flag but later on Twitter he proclaims he's now a Hindu. So I guess you'd still believe him? Come on mate. You can do this.
It's a duck mate. You can believe your eyes. It's ok. You've been lied to for a really long time and it's hard to undo all that because it defines a lot of who you are as a person. I've been there mate. The first step can be from this though. He did a Nazi salute. You don't have to unravel the rest of your beliefs yet. Just start with admitting what we all saw with our eyes. He did it twice just to make sure you knew.
This is not far off from the logic of acting like a cop is part of the working class. This isn't "working class attacking each other". This is literally a sticker with the richest dude on the world on it. This is shaming what is most likely some petty bourgeoisie. Or someone that thinks their class interest align with them.
Liberals trying to not defend Nazis challenge impossible.
Like, do you think the insulting part of this is the cock sucking? Elon has a cock (presumably) and anyone (man, women, enby) is sucking it by owning a Cyber truck.
This is anti Nazi. Holy shit liberals need to get their priorities straight.
Isn't the whole major factor of climate change being that the atmosphere is able to retain more moisture? I may be wrong but I thought I read an article about this. A major shift being a lot of dry periods in regions followed by very wet periods. Essentially the atmosphere can hold more moisture so it has longer dry periods and then much more intense rain and floods. Which would obviously be similar for snowfall.
Dude is literally an Arab Jew. Wow. You can't make this shit up.
Somehow someone's gonna blame this on Hamas.
Yeah. I know you're just adding it for the comment. But don't actually bother the cashier with some grandstanding or lecturing. Honestly, a good "nah, I don't like kids" is a much better response to brighten their day. They've heard Karen complain about the guilt trip nature 100x already.
You realize arguing against your own strawman is not addressing my argument right? I guess you just convinced yourself that I actually said "any type of insult is acceptable". I never said that. YOU said that. Everything you've said since then has been pointless rambling and arguing against something I never said.