Could be they only allow you to see the ones having a good day and following orders. I have a vague recollection of some backstage scandals hastening the ban in Finland. Turns out humans aren't that great at taking care of the needs of complex beings.

Atuin (by @ellie@hachyderm.io) makes the history storage and management side much easier and portable, but could perhaps use a "smite mode" to make deletion interactively easier. The current interactive implementation prioritizes safety over expediency which is fine, but a "today I clean things" option could perhaps instead prioritize the other way around and enable one key delete w/ undo instead.

The thing is though that the entire concept of LLMs is on purpose to be bias machines ingested from the collective cesspool of humanity. Thus even absent deliberate system prompts, they whitewash the various biases to seem neutral because obviously this non-human entity is not troubled by human concerns.

Slackware still exists, if they survive they'll be nigh immortal.

Large team? Yes. hundreds of millions in operating budget per year? No.

Ignoring the subject matter, that's a terrible LLM slop article. Odd phrasing and extra words like Zanonical all around. Just a wholly unreliable source for anything if they allow that on their platform.

Faulty .ru instead of \.ru regex ban somewhere? Hopefully it's not that, but would be funny.

Off the top of my head, it makes it desirable to cook the stats to get money, whether by banning abortion or simply prioritizing births vs children. Every funding metric is gamed, that's why there's arcane rules to enact change by hoping for a certain game strategy. In this case every strategy leads to misery.

Paraphrasing from a recent episode of Behind the Bastards on the Vioxx scandal: There's a lot of recency bias in humans where it's difficult to look past the fuckups of the pharma industry. If their "current" MO is to make a shit ton of money at the cost of human lives, then why would someone with lesser critical thinking skills trust them? One needs quite a bit more faculties to separate the capitalism from the good they are doing and tell apart what's trustworthy and what not.

So pharma fucked their bed spectacularly and aren't doing fuck all to restore trust. And that's very sad considering how important they could be if they wanted to.

Yeah, this is the problem in that the definitions vary between "inclusive of trans women and NB" to "NB leaning on fem" and all the way to "any trans identity that wants to include feminity". In the end though it might not matter since more inclusive is better and CWs are encouraged anyway for touchy topics.

Totally get that, many practical reasons! I'd vote for including it in the name as well. I did check the sidebar but managed to miss that.

Having googled some definitions, transfem is one of those terms that doesn't have one clear definition whereas MtF has enough history to be fairly unambiguous. No matter what it would draw a slightly different venn diagram as a name. That isn't a bad thing, just not sure what it looks like from an NB angle.