9
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br to c/brasil@lemmy.eco.br

Acho que já faz um mês que o hexbear.net teve problemas com o nome de domínio, mas, segundo eu entendo, isso foi resolvido do lado deles. Seria necessária alguma ação, seja da parte deles, seja da nossa (lemmy.eco.br), para resumir a federação?

Pergunto porque gostava muito de algumas comunidades de lá e o site deles é bastante ativo. Faz falta no meu feed.

Edit: lembro agora que eles tiveram uma votação pra usar allowlist ou blocklist, mas não sei no que deu isso

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 40 points 11 months ago

Maybe the best "fight" in part 3, besides DIO

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 59 points 1 year ago

What's the original?

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 85 points 1 year ago

Well, you're sure to reach tons of Google users there

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 32 points 1 year ago

So a group of thieves is a business, huh

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 46 points 1 year ago

Also, it seems like the ISPs were the ones that blocked access. No word from the government yet. Kinda weird to call this a "ban".

10

Tentei fazer upload de uma imagem através de vários frontends (Thunder no Android, Photon e frontend default no browsee) de uma imagem nos comentários. Ela não ultrapassa o limite de 640kB. Existe alguma restrição nesse servidor de upload em comentário? Imaginei que talvez houvesse para barrar spam

11
First MagLev cube? (lemmy.eco.br)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br to c/cubers@lemmy.world

I was wondering earlier today what were the first cubes to achieve some milestones, such as the Guhong with torpedoes and such. After a quick search, it appears to me that the first cube to implement MagLev as the default was the MoYu Weilong WR M 2021, but I couldn't find any authoritative source on that, so I'm just left wondering.

Is anyone aware of any earlier cubes that implemented this technology?

Also, what is your earliest bought speedcube? It's pretty crazy to compare my Zhanchi to a WRM V9 in 2024, especially with remembering how stickered cubes were the norm back then.

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 35 points 2 years ago

The original project was bought by a company known for injecting ads into their apps, so this fork was made by one of the original maintainers in order to keep it ad-free. This is just off the top of my head, so go look into the project if this interests you.

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 59 points 2 years ago

GNU is Now Unix

12
submitted 2 years ago by Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br to c/cubers@lemmy.world

So, I've been to my first comp (yay) and one of the events was one-handed. Now, I don't really practice the event that much, so I just kind of winged it and was happy to get a best time of 34 seconds.

I think this has got me invested in the event, so, rather than using the same cube for both regular 3x3 and OH, I'd rather have a looser, smaller cube for that. What are some of the best recommendations for a small 3x3 (like between 50mm and 54mm) in the current year?

9
submitted 2 years ago by Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br to c/brasil@lemmy.eco.br

Peço perdão ao time de moderação se não for o local adequado para perguntar isso. Também já adianto que não sou da computação, então posso estar me preocupando com um problema inexistente.

Conforme eu uso mais o Lemmy e vejo as comunidades que sigo crescerem, fico pensando em quão eficiente é o uso de recursos das instâncias individuais. Com isso, quero dizer: pelo que entendo, quando eu, usuário do lemmy.eco.br, me inscrevo em determinada comunidade em outra instância, uma cópia é criada no servidor de que meu usuário é nativo. Os posts, comentários e, mais importantemente, arquivos e imagens associados são clonados também, pelo que entendi.

Li em algum lugar que são 20 (ou um número qualquer, mas não todos) os posts copiados quando algum usuário se inscreve numa comunidade "nova" para a instância de que ele é nativo (significando: ele é o primeiro usuário da instância que se inscreve naquela determinada comunidade que está baseada em outra instância), o que deve ajudar um pouco, mas talvez isso nem seja o caso, já que foi só algo que li por aí.

Sei que a instância só vai fazendo cópias conforme os usuários se inscrevem por aí, então não existe uma cópia de todo "lemmyverso" em todas as instâncias, ao que entendo. Isso também exclui instâncias desfederadas, imagino.

Ainda assim, imagino que o uso dos recursos aumenta bastante conforme mais usuários participam, especialmente os chamados power users, que se inscrevem em múltiplas comunidades e obrigam a instância de origem a fazerem cópias de diversas comunidades.

Outra questão que pensei diz respeito a usuários inativos. Se alguém cria uma conta, se inscreve em determinada comunidade em que nenhum usuário da instância tenha se inscrevido antes e deixa de acessar a conta, esse usuário está criando um gasto à instância desnecessariamente.

Tendo em mente essas considerações e que eu talvez nem saiba do que estou falando, gostaria de saber o parecer de vocês, especialmente a administração da instância, sobre o que eu falo. Estou falando groselha? Entendi errado como funciona o Lemmy? E, se não, é sustentável um servidor que funcione nessa lógica a longo prazo? Existe algum "prazo" para deletar conteúdo antigo, para ajudar com armazenamento?

Agradeço desde logo a paciência com meu desconhecimento.

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 35 points 2 years ago

Right in the beginning, the article mentions that inhaling secondhand smoke can be bad for cats.

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I've been using it the past few months - since April, if memory serves me. I mostly interact with one contact, individually, and a small group with others.

There's definitely been a few hiccups. I use the default servers, and there's been times when they weren't reliable in the past, but that's been rare. The app itself is not really buggy, but it gives you options without really explaining them, regarding configuration of messaging servers and file transfer servers. You have to go and read the documentation, which is actually pretty good.

Regarding battery consumption, it's been very battery efficient for me, and this is considering I use the service to receive notifications instantly. This is on a degoogled Galaxy S8, so YMMV. Anyway, there's plans to use some implementation of UnifiedPush in the future, if I recall correctly?

The bad parts are not really a big deal, in my opinion. I've tried a few private messengers in the past, such as Jami, Briar, Signal and (even though this definition is controversial) Telegram, through Nekogram. SimpleX has been the best one so far.

One of the reasons is the feature set. It really tries to be a "mainstream" messaging app, with a sane default set of features. You can send messages, make groups, big and small (the biggest I've been in had some 400 members - it was the app's support and development group), send pictures, video, audio, use a command line client and, since last week, try out the desktop GUI client. I don't remember if this last one had other releases, but I tried the AppImage, on Linux. It's okay, if a bit slow.

Also, there's no user ID and the messages can be routed through Tor, and I think they are by default. Do your research on this, as I'm not too sure, but the way they manage not having a user ID is that they usage message queues on each server, and each is particular to a group or connection between contacts. So you don't have an ID, people can't search you, and it's only you that can give out a link to connect to you. Such a link can be revoked and regenerated at any time, so it's a platform that is inherently immune to spam.

Regarding the servers, there is the possibility to host your own. Even though I have a small personal server, which serves as a backup for my files and some other small stuff, I have not tried setting up a SimpleX server because my communication with the app is vital and I don't have the budget to build a trusty server just yet, so I can't make a review of self-hosting a server. Still, it's good that the option is there.

Anyway, what I like most about SimpleX is the steady pace of development. As I said, I've been using it for just a few months, but a lot has changed already - it's gone from version 4.something to 5.2. The file transfer, which was slow when I first used the app, has been through a whole redesign, in terms of the protocol used, and they've created what they call XFTP, which I think stands for simpleX File Trasfer Protocol. You can self-host your servers with this protocol and they've completely changed the game, in terms of sending and receiving files. It makes me very hopeful for the project to see features being steadily implemented. A ton of small others have been added since I've been using the app, but that's the big one, in my opinion.

Phew. That was quite the write. I don't have to say this, but I am quite invested in this app and want to see it succeed, so I obviously recommend people try it. The problem is convincing regular people to "download one more app".

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 54 points 2 years ago

I suppose the gf explaining wouldn't be the most embarassing thing ever if she had to use sign language.

I don't know, this sounds made up, but it's 4chan, so of course it is.

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 44 points 2 years ago

I think it's as you say. Lemmy's growth is going to happen in waves, until it has reached a critical mass that sustains its own "weight", in terms of growth.

You have to remember that this is no commercial platform, with little advertisement, which is made by its own users. Growth is bound to be slow, at first.

view more: next ›

Emanuel

joined 2 years ago