[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Nazis are well known for lacking any ability to feel embarrassed by their actions.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Nope, sorry, we're all just here to post "Russian disinformation" to the....100 or so people who visit here each month. That's all part of Putin's master plan, to trick 100 people a month you see. That way it will only take him 1083 or so years and he'll have tricked everyone in the west!

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago

"Just gotta grind to get that prestige gear, then we can start winning this war."

"Just spending some time smurfing in bronze league then we'll shoot up straight past gold."

"If we trail at the half, they'll let their guard down and we'll shoot right past them."

"When we win this war, I'm going to Disneyland!"

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 year ago

Indeed. Russia will most likely be the next big "enemy of socialism" in the world after the western bloc collapses. The difference is that they'll be much, much weaker than the whole western bloc and will struggle to prevent socialist uprisings in other countries (and hopefully, even in their own).

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 1 year ago

Anyone who thinks communists are in an "echo chamber" have never actually spoken to communists. I've gotten into far more actual debates and discussions about the most obscure shit in communist circles than I have anywhere else.

Some CHUD spouting the exact same "million billion dead authoritarian no ifone vuvuzela 1948" nonsense is not actually worth talking to.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago

How do we choke Iraq though?

Is it bombs? I'm guessing the answer is bombs.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 year ago

Not really a fan of this sort of stuff. Dehumanising your enemies and treating them as monsters never ends well.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

No, the original text is just laughing, I just used the same font.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Look at the view counts on those videos, then look at the length, then look at the number of ads they put in them.

It's a grift, they do a low effort rant video that requires little to no editing and make bank.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Ah! Thank you! That's exactly the problem I've been having. I've been feeling lost when I try to understand them, because I've been feeling obligated to discuss these things on their terms. I can't challenge the ideas that AES are revisionist without feeling dogpiled, and I can't bring up ideas of how the western left is obsessed with purity and matyrdom without being told that they are sick of being accused of having a purity fetish. (Funny how MLs keep saying the same things to them and they just respond with "stop saying that" rather than analyzing why people say it) Hell, when talking to them, it feels like I can't bring up any counter points at all without being told I'm "stifling discussion" or something. Hence my initial question. I'm perpetually on the defensive because they take these things as gospel and state them with the confidence of a smug liberal. It's all a smokescreen, saying something technically or arguably true, that misses the forest for the trees. It's frustrating, because I really do want to understand their arguments and point of view, but it all seems to boil down (sorry) to this sort of thing. Just ignoring overall material conditions in favour of purity tests. A shame I can't really get this across to any Maoists without just getting banned or blocked (hell, I'll probably be banned from at least one discord server just for posting that initial question here.) But if their response to someone trying to understand their form of Marxism is to shut them out, it only shows their lack of understanding.

48

Hi! Long time lurker, first time poster. Been discussing stuff with MLs of all stripes recently, and have come across a common statement used by a lot of Maoists which frustrates me.

They seem to always fall back on statements like "The CPC allows billionaires in their ranks, so they are revisionist."

Maoists have often used this as a kind of "gotcha" argument against more traditional MLs, or "Dengists" as they love to label us.

It's frustrating, because...I don't disagree really, allowing members of the bourgeoisie to hold political power is pretty much the definition of revisionism. The problem is, this feels more like a way to silence dissent or discussion rather than facilitate it. Feels like an overly simplistic hard line that simplifies history into binary divisions. Often followed by an implied "China is revisionist, therefore Maoism is the only working form of socialism."

I'm reaching out to people to see if anyone has any ways to combat this, in a way that encourages discussion rather than it just devolving into insults or truisms hurled back and forth without thought.

view more: next ›

DamarcusArt

joined 2 years ago