[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 1 points 3 days ago

You are vastly underestimating the youths current addiction to social media. Take it away and you will see some rapid pursuit of novelty.

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 4 points 4 days ago

I'm ok with both, but prefer co-ops because the members get direct voting on large decisions by default, rather than a proxy vote via an appointed government worker who answers to the municipal government.

That said, there is no reason these can't be one and the same, the local government could fund the establishment of a regional co-op and maintain audit and some other limited authority over it.

I also support long-distance fiber infrastructure being built and maintained by worker's co-ops that would then get paid for service by the regional ISPs. Worker members would be highly motivated to maintain good uptime, and hiring/training members who live local to the fiber lines in remote regions would be possible with the incentive of worker ownership. Once built it is a long term maintenance and security business with steady return, perfect for a worker's co-op that could be financed with private capital at decent ROI.

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 6 points 4 days ago

Nice! Thanks for posting this. Does it run on all wifi bands? Is there provision for mesh extension by wired Intranet?

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 20 points 6 days ago

Prohibition leads to the propagation of means of evasion. By attempting to ban teenagers from popular means of communications they will incentivize mass adoption of "illicit means" of communications, and create another generation both familiar and comfortable with "illegal online activity" like the Napster generation. Just like Napster, this will also accidentally push youth into online platforms and channels where they are more likely to encounter content not suitable for minors and malware.

The only "truly effective" form that this type of internet control can take is requiring a digital ID verification to establish a connection to the network at the ISP, and that is a nightmare setup we should be prepared to fight tooth and nail.

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 2 points 6 days ago

I have suggested a couple of times now that ActivityPub should implement an encryption layer for user authentication of requests and pings. It already has a system for instances vauching for each other. The situation is that users of "walled garden" instances in ActivityPub lack means of interfacing with public facing instances that doesnt leave the network open for scraping. I believe a pivot towards default registered users only content service built on encrypted handshakes, with the ability for servers to opt-in to serving content to unregistered users would make the whole network much more robust and less dependent on third party contingencies like CloudFlare.

Then again, maybe I should just be looking for a different network, I'm sure there are services in the blockchain/cryptosphere that take that approach, I just would rather participate in a network built on commons rather than financialization at it's core. Where is the protocol doing both hardened network and distributed volunteer instances?

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 3 points 6 days ago

How is Gemini fairing in the existing bot landscape? Usenet?

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 3 points 6 days ago

Damn, how was this not big headline news?

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 9 points 6 days ago

And of course in Cyberpunk the ttrpg setting much of the o0en internet was rendered useless by self replicating AI malware hijacking storage, processing, and bandwidth due to a zero day exploit discovered by one egomaniacal hacker.

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 17 points 1 week ago

a gentleperson and a scholar

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 74 points 1 week ago

Please read the article before commenting.

"The model is named Apertus – Latin for “open” – highlighting its distinctive feature: the entire development process, including its architecture, model weights, and training data and recipes, is openly accessible and fully documented."

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 34 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, closing your sinuses is a natural reflex response for humans, and people have greater or lesser at will control over it.

The nose holding for swimming is more about how strong that sinus closure is and endurance. People with larger sinus openings have a more difficult time keeping them closed and resisting pressure like water entering from jumping into a pool. Also some people have a hard time keeping them closed for any prolonged period.

In other words, you just have totally ripped sinuses breh.

[-] Cooper8@feddit.online 16 points 2 weeks ago

It is actually an old and well established britishism

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Cooper8

joined 3 weeks ago