Neither do they have copyright of the stock art they used to purchase. The complete piece, however, including pip boy, is not AI generated. Someone put this together, put effort into it, which easily qualifies it for copyright protection, even if the background is AI generated instead of bought stock art.
They first will try to make it go to work, then they will try to marry it.
Yeah, but it's not noticeable to the billionaires, so they don't see a reason to act.
Nah, morons just get more and more comfortable to openly be morons. A trend that's going on for quite a while.
I'm not sure, but let's be honest, it was probably Zynga.
Don't worry, it actually puts the lives of a few select people over everything and everyone else, under the disguise of "tHe eCoNOmY".
Me: "People of Reddit, what feeling is more satisfying than sex?"
Redditors:
They care about young children, just not in any good way...
Got places to go, gotta follow my rainbow
When I was still using it for science we simply boasted about our achievements and called that "networking".
My new paper is out in the International Journal of Unreproducible Science, cite me, I'm begging you!
Kibby no, drop Lemmy!
Balios
joined 1 year ago
The US is also a prime example why simply getting rid of an ID does not actually solve any of these issues for the mentioned groups. If anything you can see more problems with voter registration and information that partially would be solved by a unified ID issued to each legal citizen.
Or in other words: People will always find a way to exclude groups on purpose and they will always be lazy to implement new measures to include a smaller pool of people, especially if they feel including those people might not even benefit them.
And ID is a good first step but it's of course also not enough to reach everyone who legally can vote.