There are a number of compression algorithms that prioritize decompression speed, usually at the expense of higher compression times.

While it's <10% across the entire population, LGBTQ identification rates are at 23% for GenZ. https://news.gallup.com/poll/656708/lgbtq-identification-rises.aspx

But the reason it's an issue for many is that people don't really say "normal" to refer to things like sexuality, gender, etc. in a "statistically most likely" way, they use it specifically to exclude the other group from being considered normal as something lesser. Or, to put it another way...

Let's be honest here. a high percentage of the time that someone categorizes something (implicitly or explicitly) as "abnormal" it is done with intent to label the subject as something undesirable. It's pretty safe to say that if a term is very often used in a negative way in a specific context, then we can reasonably assume that default definition when that's the context we're in. I don't understand why people are so often afraid to acknowledge that we don't live in a world of pure definitions, and rather must exist in a situation where the context of a statement is relevant.

Doing their part in getting us towards the reality where we can push the moon out of orbit.

Let's not, the idiots running the show in the US will just rename it to the Gulf of Patriotism or some dumb bullshit.

Of course not, that would provide legitimate status, and would allow them to leave their husbands. Best to connect their presence here to the man so that their leaving is under threat of deportation.

He got more votes than Harris, but less than 50%.